Vidéo de propagande d’un jeune activiste vidéastre

11/04/2019

Avant d’aller plus loin, écoutez le video en question:

(Page Facebook de l’auteur: https://www.facebook.com/emileroyprod)

C’est tellement rempli de mensonges et de faussetés, je n’ai pas pu laisser passer ça. En plus les gens commentaient comment c’était dont merveilleux et que ça devait être présenté dans les écoles…

Dès le départ c’est un vidéo qui utilise le sensationalisme pour toucher le plus de gens possible. Le type est vidéastre, c’est son boulot! Il se sert de son boulot pour promouvoir son activisme personnel (et se faire de la pub). Mais les « faits » cités sont tous faux. Faut pas lui en vouloir, ces jeunes sont brainwashés depuis la maternelle par la religion verte.

Alors je vais le démontrer point par point.

Le CO2 provoque un réchauffement en trappant la chaleur du Soleil.

Faux,C’est basé sur une hypothèse datant du 19e siècle, qui avait été pour ainsi dire ignorée, jusqu’à ce que des politiciens à la fin des années 1970 réalisent qu’ils pourraient utiliser cette hypothèse à leur avantage, puis d’autre groupes d’intérêt ont aussi vu la bonne affaire. A cette époque, cette hypothèse était encore valable dans le sens qu’en science, une hypothèse (tentative d’explication d’un phénomène) reste valide tant qu’elle n’est pas contredite par les faits et observations. Si ça arrive, selon la méthode scientifique, l’hypothèse doit être abandonnée et remplacée par une autre. Mais depuis 20 ans, cette hypothèse ne tient plus la route. Toute les prédictions faite à partir de l’hypothèse du CO2 ont été très loin des observations, souvent même le contraire est arrivé. Mais l’hypohèse a été gardé en vie par les politiciens et activistes parce qu’il y a trop d’argent en jeu. On parle de millions de milliards.
La réalité est que bien que le CO2 soit un gaz à effet de serre, il est en quantité infime dans l’atmosphère et son effet « de serre » a été grandement exagéré à des fin politiques. Même chose avec le méthane dont l’effet a été exagéré de 400% ( https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/30/methane-warming-exaggerated-by-400/ ).
Voici la concentration de CO2 dans l’atmosphère ainsi que la part qui est due à l’activité humaine. Le CO2 est à 0,04%, et la part de l’humain en CO2 est de 3% de ce faible pourcentage, donc 0,0016%. Le principal gaz à effet de serre (et de loin) est la vapeur d’eau, donc les nuages.

L’effet « de serre » du CO2 est négligeable. Passé 400ppm (le taux actuel) il y a un effet de saturation de bande, ce qui fait que plus on augmente le CO2, moins il à d’effet.
Source: http://owww.met.hu/idojaras/IDOJARAS_vol111_No1_01.pdf

S’il était aussi puissant que les activistes le disent, alors pourquoi Mars avec 95% de CO2 dans son atmosphère est si froide, alors que nous avec 0,04% ça serait la castrophe?
Ou plus simplement, voici les taux de CO2 et la température depuis 500 millions d’années. Est-ce qu’il y a une corréation entre les deux? Est-ce que vous remarquez comment la période actuelle (à droite) est FROIDE et PAUVRE en CO2?

Si le taux de CO2 avait l’effet réchauffant catastrophique qu’il dit, alors pourquoi il y avait des périodes où le CO2 augmentait, alors que le température descendait, ou vice versa? Il est aussi à noter que les périodes plus chaudes ont été des périodes prospères pour la vie sur terre, plus qu’à notre ère où l’on subit des ères glaciaires à répétition depuis quelques millions d’années.

Le graphique qu’il utilise dans son vidéo vient de l’étude des carottes de glace de Vostok, aussi utilisé dans le film de Al Gore, film de propagande dont un juge a déterminé qu’il contenait des faussetés et des demi-vérité, mais qui continue quand même à être présenté dans les écoles.

Le graphe utilisé par Al Gore représente les entrées et sorties des ères glaciaires passés, qui en passant correspond à la partie froide « quaternaire » sur le graphique prédédent. (Notez aussi que l’échelle du temp sur le graphe que j’ai présenté n’est pas linéaire, sinon toute cette période n’y serait qu’un seul point). Ce qui avait été fait dans le film c’est séparer les graphiques au lieu de les superposer, et ajuster les échelles pour faire correspondre la température et le CO2. L’étude de ces données a démontré que durant toutes ces centaines de milliers d’années, c’est la température qui monte AVANT, et le CO2 monte APRES, des fois avec 800 ans de retard. D’autre fois la température descent, alors que le CO2 est plus élevé. Le CO2 ne peut donc pas être le facteur qui influence la température, mais est plutôt un effet secondaire de la hausse de température, c’est à dire que quand la température augmente, ça provoque un dégasage des océans (un océan qui se réchauffe libère du CO2, alors qu’un océan qui refroidit en absorbe).
Alors le truc utilisé par Al gore (et par lui aussi) est de séparer les graphiques et exagérer l’échelle du CO2 (parce qu’il varie très peu, quelques dizaines de partie par millions). Si on superpose les graphiques, l’arnaque est exposée
Par exemple, sur le grahique suivant, vers 240000, on voit très bien qu’il y a des centaines d’années de délai entre la hausse de tempétaure et la hausse du CO2. Aussi, vers 232000, on voit une période où le CO2 augmente, mais la température diminue. Il y a des cas comme ca partout durant des centaines de milliers d’années, et on veut nous faire croire que nous notre petit 1 degré en 100 ans est exceptionnel, et est notre faute?

Si on prend des données plus proches de nous, provenant de la même étude, on peut voir que la sortie de la dernière ère glaciaire s’est faite AVANT que le CO2 augmente. Vers 12000 ans, on peut voir que la température à monté de presque 4 degrés alors que le CO2 ne bougeait pas, et a commencé à monter des centaines d’années après.

Source: http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming-2/ice-core-graph/
Donc contrairement à ce qu’ils disent, il n’y a pas de corrélation directe entre CO2 et température, et la seule faible corrélation est que quand la température augmente, le CO2 augmente légerement. Les variations de température sont donc dues à d’autre facteurs qui sont entièrement naturels (cycles orbitaux, solaires et océaniques) et les variations plus importantes de CO2, comme celle qu’on voit depuis 100 ans, sont dues à d’autres phénomènes.

Notre mode de vie est en cause
FAUX, l’impact de l’humain sur le climat est insignifiant, tel que démontré précédemment. Le CO2 n’a qu’un impact limité sur le climat, et seulement 3% des émissions annuelles de CO2 sont dues à l’humain, le 97% qui reste est naturel. La hausse du CO2 est même bénéfique.
Conférence sur le sujet si ça vous intéresse:

Transcription: https://www.thegwpf.org/patrick-moore-should-we-celebrate-carbon-dioxide/
Alors oui, ce sont des cycles naturels, et l’humain a un impact insignifiant comparé à la variabilité naturelle.
L’humain a un impact à d’autres niveaux bien sûr, comme la pollution due à la mauvaise gestion des déchets. Mais ironiquement ce sont les pays qui sont justement les plus industrialisés et les plus riches qui polluent le moins, il faut être riche pour jouer à l’écolo. Les pays pauvres jettent leur déchets dans la nature, les rivières et ca fini dans les océeans
95% de tout le plastique dans les océans vient de seulement 10 rivères, toutes situées dans des pays pauvres et presque toutes en Asie. Nous, les occidentaux n’y sommes que pour un centième de fraction de pourcentage, majoritairement des naufrages de bateaux, ou filet de pêches perdus.
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4970214/95-plastic-oceans-comes-just-TEN-rivers.html

Déforestation et extinctions
Non ce n’est pas la catastrophe non plus, les espèces d’animaux il y en a toujours eu qui disparaissent et d’autres qui apparaissent, ça s’appelle l’évolution. 99% des espèces ayant déjà existé sont éteintes aujourd’hui. Dans les statistiques qu’il montre (sans source), il n’y a pas de lien direct avec par l’activité humaine, la déforestation ou l’élevage. Et l’élevage « intensif » et les combustibles fossiles, que nous, les pays développés ont utilisé depuis des décennies, et qui nous ont permit de nous sortir de la misère, nous enrichir, d’avoir une longévité exceptionelle et un niveau de vie jamais atteint avant dans toute l’histoire de l’humanité, il faudrait qu’on empêche les pays pauvres de faire pareil? Tout ça à cause d’une hypothèse politisée démontrée fausse? Qui ils sont pour aller dire aux pays pauvres de rester pauvres et misérables?
Sans cette industrialisation de l’agriculture, on serait incapables de nourrir la planète. Les néo-malthusiens (extrémistes écologistes qui considèrent que l’humain est un cancer) souhaitent la mort de 95% de l’humanité, mais quand on leur demande qui devrait mourrir ou minimalement cesser de se reproduire, c’est jamais eux, mais les pauvres dans des pays sous développés par qui on devrait commencer. Et non le méthane produit par les pets de vaches, qui est en quantité infime et dont l’effet « de serre » a été grandement exagéré (tel que spécifié un peu plus haut) aussi pour servir l’agenda politique, n’est pas « nocif ».
In defence of cow farts: Livestock emissions aren’t about to destroy the world, researcher says

Aussi il est totalement faux de dire que 51% des gaz à effet de serre sont du à « l’élevage intensif ». Le méthane ne représente que 0,066% des gaz à effet de serre, et un épouvantablement faible 0,017ppm dans l’atmosmphère, comparé à 400ppm pour le CO2 et 9500ppm pour la vapeur d’eau.

Source: https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

L’agriculture et le transport sont la première cause des changements climatiques
ABSOLUMENT FAUX, si vous avez lu jusqu’ici, vous aviez bien vu que ni le CO2, ni l’activité humaine ne peuvent être responsable. L’humain a un impact léger sur le taux de CO2, mais le CO2 lui n’a qu’un impact négligeable sur le climat. Les principaux responsables des variations du climat, comme c’est le cas depuis toujours sont les cycles de Milankovitch (cycles orbitaux, etc..) qui expliquent clairement les variations du climat plus grandes, comme les cycles d’ères glaciaires ( https://www.futura-sciences.com/planete/definitions/climatologie-cycle-milankovitch-13390/ ) les multiples cycles solaires (parce qu’il y en a plusieurs qui se chevauchent) et les cycles océaniques (AMO, PDO, El Nino, etc .), indirectement affectés par les cycles solaires.
Par exemple, juste les cycles solaires combinés avec les cycles océaniques peuvent expliquer toutes les variations du climat depuis la fin du Little Ace Age, incluant donc le 1 degré en 100 ans qu’on essaye de nous mettre sur le dos.
Petit résumé que j’ai déjà fait dans le paassé : https://crioux.wordpress.com/2015/09/08/le-climat-est-la-somme-des-cycles-naturels/
Et article plus en détail sur les cycles solaires et océaniques que j’avais traduit il y a quelques années:
https://crioux.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/cycles-climatiques/
Graphique extrait de l’article qui démontre les températures actuelles superposées aux cycles naturels. On y voit le little Ice Age (période froide qui s’est terminée vers 1880), et en rouge les données de température

La corrélation avec les cycles solaires et océaniques est frappante, et on voit aussi que le réchauffement actuel est terminé et qu’on s’en retourne vers une période froide.
Le corréaltion avec le CO2 elle? Elles n’est que coïncidence entre 1970 et 1998. Avant ou après, il n’y a pas de corrélation, ou alors elle est inverse (ex: entre 1940 et 1970)

Figure : Corrélation entre les cycles solaires et la température, Selon Dr. Willie Soon, astrophysicien et géophysicien)

(Ouf, il n’y a qu’un peu plus de 2 minutes de son vidéo de passé et j’ai déjà tout ça d’écrit, je vais devoir être plus concis si je veut passer à travers les douzes minutes)


Burger

Ben oui, ca prend de l’eau pour produire presque n’importe quoi! Ça prend de l’eau pour les plantes aussi, pour nous etc.. L’eau n’est pas une ressource finie, elle n’est pas « gaspillée », elle se recycle naturellement à l’infini. L’eau en bouteille Evian est la même eau que les dinosaures ont fait pipi dedans..
Et il y a juste les activistes écolo pour ne pas se laver pour « économiser l’eau », et s’en vanter (virtue signaling).

(Et comme de raison, tout activiste de gauche ne peut pas passer à côté de chiâler contre McDonalds….)

« La source du problème »
Il dit qu’il a écouté beaucoup de « documentaires », sans les citer, mais on voit déjà que Al gore fait partie de ses références, alors que c’est une source totalement inadéquate et non-scientifique.
Et selon lui, le problème et la source de tous les problèmes, c’est bien sûr : l’argent (typique activiste de gauche anti-capitaliste)

C’est pas pour « sauver de l’argent » qu’on utilise le pétrole, c’est parce que c’est la meilleure ressource énergétique disponible partout dans le monde, à cout raisonnable, fiable, rentable et efficace.
Les énergies « vertes » alternatives (éolien, solaire) ne sont pas fiables, coûtent très cher, et sont intermittentes. Pire encore, elles requièrent presque toutes plus d’énergie fossile pour les construire et installer que ce qu’elles rapportent en électricité durant toute leur vie utile, sans compter la pollution réelle causée par l’extraction des minéraux rares nécessaires pour les génératrices (les mêmes que pour les moteurs des voitures électriques) et pour les piles.

Et oui mon petit gars, c’est normal que les gens achètent ce qui est le plus abordable, il faut être très riche pour se permettre de payer plus cher juste pour se donner une bonne conscience imaginaire, ou alors faire du « virtue signaling ». Je serais curieux de voir ce que TOI tu fais dans la vraie vie.

« Les gouvernements ne priorisent pas l’environnement »
Ils font juste ça être à genoux devant les lobbysites environnementalistes, mais c’est jamais assez! Et les gouvernements au contraire profitent de cette hystérie et l’encouragent avec de multiples taxes vertes et carbones, qui n’ont aucun impact sur l’environnement, mais qui appauvrissement encore plus les citoyens, déjà pris à la gorge.
Et de toute façon c’est un problème IMAGINAIRE. Comme démontré plus haut, bientôt le prochain cycle froid s’en vient. Alors allez-vous dire que le froid est la faute du réchauffment, et qu’il faut nous taxer encore plus? ou allez-vous enfin réaliser que vous vous êtes fait avoir?

« Les pays dévelopés ont pollué pendant des décennies »
Le CO2 n’est pas un polluant, le CO2 est la base de la vie sur terre. Quand les taux de CO2 passés étaient plus élevés, en moyenne 2000ppm (c’est la dire preque tout de temps depuis 500 millions d’années) la vie était très prospère. Si le taux de CO2 devait descendre plus bas que 170ppm, c’est la fin de toute vie évoluée sur terre. Le CO2 n’a pas d’impact significatif sur le climat, en quoi est-il un polluant? Le CO2 ne correspond pas du tout à la définition de « polluant ». Sans CO2, il n’y aurait pas de vie sur terre, toute forme de vie est basée sur le carbone, et ce carbone vient à la base du CO2, en commencant par la photosynthèse.
Depuis que les taux de CO2 ont enfin commencé à remonter (majoritairement naturellement, et en petite partie à cause de l’activité humaine), la planète reverdit.
https://www.csiro.au/en/News/News-releases/2013/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2
https://phys.org/news/2016-04-co2-fertilization-greening-earth.html
Plus de CO2 est bénéfique pour les plantes, et n’a pas d’effet négatif sur les animaux, à moins d’atteindre des taux hyper élevés impossible à atteindre dans l’atmophere même si on brûlait tout les combustibles fossiles d’un seul coup. Ca prend 50000ppm avant que ça devienne toxique pour l’humain (rappel: taux actuel est 400ppm). Dans une salle de classe ou un bar, le taux de CO2 est souvent à 3000ppm, dans un sous-marin le taux acceptable est de 8000ppm.
Dans les serres les agriculteurs augmentent les taux de CO2 à 1500ppm pour augmenter la productivité. Le gouvernement de l’Ontario le recommande: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/00-077.htm

Alors non les pays développés ne sont pas responsables de la « pollution » du CO2, ni des changements climatiques. Ce sont des cycles naturels. Les « conséquences » ont été un réchauffement bénéfique depuis 100 ans, puis la conséquence qui suivra sera un refroidissement qui sera nuisible pour tout le monde, et va provoquer des famines comme ça a été le cas des cycles froid passés dans l’histoire, comme par exemple les « Dark Ages », ou le « Litle Ice age », qui ont provoqué des famines et des migrations de population et ont causé la chute de plusieurs empires (ex: Incas)

« Les autres pays ressentent les changements climatique avant nous »
Et là le type, il nous parle de pollution atmosphérique (dioxyde de souffre, suie, etc) causé par des industries dans les pays pauvres. Il ne s’agit pas de CO2 (qui n’est pas un polluant et n’a pas d’effet néfaste), il ne s’agit pas de climat non plus, c’est complètement autre chose! Les activistes aiment ça mélanger la pollution réelle avec le CO2, alors que le CO2 n’est pas un polluant.

Les changements climatiques accélèrent les sécheresses
Encore faux, je viens d’en parler un peu plus haut, la planète est plus verte maintenant qu’il y a 50 ans, grâce au CO2. Il n’y a pas plus de sécheresse, ni autre évènement météo hors norme qu’avant. En fait il y a toujours eu à l’occasion des évènements extrèmes. En voici une liste très longue tirée de documents historiques, vous allez voir des évenements météo extrèmes, des froids glacials, des chaleurs intenses, des sécheresses qui ont causé des milliers de morts et ce depuis des milliers d’années, bien avant que l’humain ne commence à émettre du CO2.
Des heures de plaisir à épelucher ces documents:
https://crioux.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/evenements-climatiques-du-passe/

Et en passant mon petit génie mal-informé, un tsunami, c’est causé par un tremblement de terre, ça n’a rien à voir avec le climat.

« Manifestations pour le climat dans les rues »
Si vous imaginez une sonconde que ces jeunes sont descendus dans les rues tout à coup de façon organique, vous être bien naïfs. Il s’agissait d’une grande opération de propagande organisée en haut niveau et qui utilisait les jeunes (comme Gretta) comme outil de propagande, tel que révélé ici:

Emails reveal how children become pawns of climate alarmism

Et quand on questionnait ces jeunes sur le climat, ils n’y connaissaient rien. Ils sont des marionettes utilisées par des puissants globalistes pour appuyer leur agenda politique de contrôle et de taxation.
Voyez ici les réponses qu’ils tentent de donner à des questions bien simples pour qui connait le dossier du climat:

Quant au Québec et au Canada, même si le CO2 était réellement un probleme (ce qui n’est pas le cas) nous avons tellement de forêts, et nos émissions sont tellement insignifiantes, que nous avons toujours été « carbo-négatif », c’est à dire qu’on absorbe beaucoup plus de CO2 qu’on émet. Et si vous pensez qu’une Taxe carbone va changer quelque chose, vous êtes naïfs. La seule chose que les taxes carbones ont eu comme impact là où ça a été essayé, c’est d’appauvrir grandement les citoyens parce que ça fait monter le prix de TOUT, et ça a été scrappé peu de temps après quand les gouvernements qui avaient imposé ça se sont fait éjecter par les électeurs.

Sables bitumineux
On exploite les sables bitumineux, parce qu’on en a besoin. Notre civilisation ne peut pas fonctionner sans le pétrole et tout ses sous produits. Personne n’a envie de revenir comme il y a 200 ans, dans la misère et le mode survie. Voyez ici:

Et c’est faux qu’il est plus polluant que les autres sources de pétrole. Il coûte un peu plus cher à exploiter, mais encore une fois, le CO2 qui est calculé dans le total, n’est pas un polluant.

Actions concrètes
Ces actions sont irréalistes, parce qu’elles sont soit irréalisables, dispendieuses, ou alors n’ont de toute façon AUCUN impact.
Non devenir vegan ne va pas « sauver la planète », encore une fois, l’histoire du méthane pour justifier de manger moins de viande a été exagéré et démoli par les spécialistes. Anyway, ça doit être drôle de voir un vegan essayer de manger des légumes « locaux » l’hiver.
Énergies renouvelables, : Oui au Québec on est chanceux de part notre géographie et notre territoire peu peuplé d’avoir de l’hydro-électricité, qui est beaucoup plus fiable, rentable que le sera jamais l’éolien ou le solaire (qui est épouvanblement mauvais dans des pays nordiques, à cause des heures d’ensoleillement limitées et du soleil trop bas sur l’horizon, sans compter la neige sur les panneaux). Alors pourquoi notre gouvernement perd plus d’un milliard par an avec l’éolien alors qu’on a déjà des surplus?
https://www.iedm.org/50485-les-finances-publiques-et-la-fili-re-olienne
Pour faire plaisir aux écolos, aux amis du partis (avec subventions) et pour gagner des votes en région.
Et encore une fois, non ce n’est pas une solution, parce que ces énergies « vertes » requièrent plus d’énergie fossile pour miner les matériaux et les construire que tout ce qu’elles rapportent en électricité, sans compter la pollution réelle et toxique pour extraire les minéraux rares pour les génératices, moteurs électriques et les piles. Et en bout de ligne elles produisent une électricité intermittente et plus chère. Impossible de faire fonctionner une civilisation avancée quand il faut vérifier la météo pour savoir s’il va y avoir de l’électricité.
Voir le résumé de tout ça ici : https://crioux.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/eoliennes-polluantes/

J’ai pas envie de me faire dicter mon avenir
Et qu’est-ce que vous pensez que vous faites? Vous voulez dicter au autres comment vivre.
Et l’histoire justement va se rappeler de cette hystérie climatique comme un exemple de brainwash des masses, comment un mouvement politique qui voulait contrôler et taxer, en se disant « basé sur la science » alors qu’il était anti-science. Cette hystérie de masse touche à sa fin. Bientôt le climat va commencer à se refroidir alors que le cycle suivant arrive. Déjà le soleil entre dans une de ses phases les plus calmes depuis 200 ans. Pendant un moment, ceux qui profitent de cette arnaque vont tenter de le cacher, faire de la propagande excessive, ou alors même dire que le froid est causé par le réchauffement, et que donc il faut encore plus de taxes pour le combattre. Mais les gens commencent à se reveiller. Et quand cette arnaque sera enfin démolie, l’humanité pourra enfin se concentrer sur les problèmes réels (y compris les vrais problèmes environnementaux) au lieu des problèmes imaginaires.

(Ouf!, ça a été lourd comme exercice d’écouter toute cette propagande)

Quelques citations en terminant:

Henry-Louis Mencken:
« L’objectif global des pratiques politiques est de garder la population alarmée — et donc voulant être mené vers la sécurité — en la menacant avec toute une série de croques-mitaines, tous imaginaires. »

« L’urgence de sauver l’humanité est presque toujours seulement une fausse facade pour l’urgence de la contrôler. «

Vincent Courtillot, géophysicien : Quelle que soit la nature d’un sujet scientifique, quand on vous dit que ce sujet scientifique est réglé, qu’il n’y a plus besoin de regarder, que les solutions sont connues et qu’il n’y a plus lieu à débat, inquiétez-vous! C’est que vous êtes en train d’approcher du dogme ou de la religion, mais pas de la science. Là où il n’y a plus de débat, il n’y a plus de science.

« Je pense que l’un des aspects les plus pernicieux du mouvement environnementaliste moderne est la romantisation de la vie paysanne, sans oublier leur idée voulant que les sociétés industrielles soient en train de détruire le monde. Le mouvement environnementaliste s’est développé en utilisant les efforts les plus vigoureux pour stopper le développement dans les pays sous-développés. Je pense que c’est légitime, pour moi, de les qualifier d’anti-humains. »
-Patrick Moore, ex-co-fondateur de Greepeace

Publicités

Que va-t-il arriver quand l’arnaque réchauffiste sera démolie?

09/04/2019

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history… When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.
Kimori Itoh, Ph.D., Industrial Chemistry, IPCC expert reviewer.
Source: https://www.webcitation.org/6J5Ye6AL2

Origine de l’hypothèse:
A l’origine, l’hypothèse du CO2 qui causerait un réchauffement climatique était une hypothèse scientifique parmi d’autres vers la fin du 19e siècle, comme celles qui parlait de l’influence du volcanisme ou des cycles solaires sur le climat, et elle est resté dans l’oubli pendant des décennies. Puis durant les années 1960, on parlait plutôt de refroidissement climatique, causé (bien sûr) par la pollution humaine. Puis vers la moitié des années 1970, on parlait maintenant de réchauffement climatique, causé (bien sûr) par la pollution humaine.

Sauf qu’on sait maintenant que les températures ont monté depuis la fin du « little Ice Age » jusqu’en 1940 (alors que l’activité industrielle, et donc les émission humaines de CO2, était encore basse), puis ont descendu légèrement entre 1940 et 1970 (global cooling), puis ont remonté entre 1970 et 2000. Depuis c’est un plateau (aucune augmentation statistiquement significative, sauf des pics El Nino). Aucun lien possible avec le CO2 émit par l’activité humaine, qui a surtout commencé vers 1940 (boom industriel d’après guerre) et est devenu plus intensif depuis 2000 (industrialisation de la Chine et de l’Inde). Donc aucune corrélation avec le CO2, mais une corrélation presque parfaite avec les cycles naturels océaniques et cycles solaires (qui sont le sujet d’autres billets postés précédemment).

Si c’est naturel, alors pourquoi cette hystérie?
Bien des groupes d’intérets ont flairé la bonne affaire. Que ce soit pour le pouvoir politique, l’argent (taxes et subventions) ou la subversion idéologique. Par exemple, Margaret Thatcher était en conflit ouvert avec le syndicat des mineurs de charbon. Quand ils faisaient la grève, le pays tombait dans le noir parce que l’électricité était presque toute produite par des centrales au charbon. Elle a vu l’opportunité d’utiliser cette histoire de CO2 dont presque personne ne parlait pour pousser l’option nucléaire. Elle a mis de l’argent sur la table pour que des scientifiques produisent un rapport à ce sujet. Ce qu’ils ont bien sûr fait.
(Source: The great global warming Swindle)
Donc des politiciens ont récupéré cette hypothèse (qui était à l’époque une simple hypothèse parmis d’autres) pour appuyer leur agenda politique.

D’autres ont saisi l’opportunité pour s’enrichir, comme Al Gore qui a investit dans les énergies « vertes », puis fait un pseudo-documentaire alarmiste que l’on connait tous: « Inconvenient Truth » et qui est encore présenté dans les écoles malgré qu’il a été démontré par un juge être rempli d’erreurs et de demi-vérités. Les gens paniqués ont ensuite fait pression sur les politiciens pour qu’ils « fassent quelque chose », ce qu’ils ont fait en investissant massivement dans les énergies « vertes », et Al Gore est devenu presque milliardaire en peu de temps. Et il le serait devenu s’il n’y avait pa eu le crash de la bourse du carbone de Chicago, dans laquelle il avait aussi massivement investi.. Alors il est « juste » multi-multi-milionnaire.

Et l’ONU n’étant pas en reste, ils ont fondé vers 1988 le GIEC (IPCC), un organisme de propagande qui sert à dire aux politiciens que le réchauffement existe (jamais il n’est remis en question) et ce qu’ils doivent faire pour le « combattre »: collecter des centaines de milliards en taxes et l’envoyer aux bureaucrates corrompus de l’ONU.

Les organismes environementalistes aussi ont profité de la manne, plus ils font peur au gens avec de la propagande, plus ils recoivent des millions en dons et en subventions. Malgré des débuts humbles, Greenpeace est maintenant multi-milionnaire.

Mêmes les socialistes/communistes en ont profité pour dire que c’était la faute des corporations et du capitalisme, et que donc le communisme était la solution pour « sauver la planète », ignorant volontairement le fait que les pays communistes sont bien plus pollueurs que les pays capitalistes. Il faut être riche pour jouer aux écolos.

Changement de cap
Sauf que depuis 20 ans, l’hypothèse a pris du plomb dans l’aile. Non seulement aucunes des prédictions alarmistes comme quoi la terre devait devenir un désert brûlant n’arrivent pas, mais en plus il n’y avait aucun réchauffement depuis 1998. C’est pour cette raison qu’ils ont changé le nom « réchauffement climatique » en « changements climatiques » en 2008, alors que ça faisait 10 ans qu’il n’y avait plus de réchauffement. Comme ça chaud ou froid, sécheresses ou inondations, qu’importe ce qui arrive, ils peuvent toujours dire qu’ils ont raison. C’est pour les mêmes raisons que James Lovelock, un des plus alarmistes des activistes a complètement changé d’idée en 2012 et est devenu sceptique. Il a été bien sur renié par les adeptes de la religion verte (un autre mouvement formé autour de cette arnaque)

A partir de 2010, plus le temps passe, plus l’hypothèse se fait démolir, mais reste en vie uniquement à cause du support politique.

A partir de ce momment, ils ne peuvent plus dire qu’ils n’étaient pas au courant que c’était une arnaque, les preuves commencent à sortir un peu partout, il y a eu plusieurs scandales de manipulation de données (comme le Climategate) qui ont été étouffés. Mais il y a tellement d’argent en jeu, des centaines de milliers de milliards, que la plupart ont choisi de fermer les yeux et ignorer la science. Dès lors, on est uniquement dans la manipulation de l’opinion publique, et non plus dans la science. Tel que cité dans un des emails du climate gate:

Michael Mann (à Phil Jones) à propos des sceptiques (extrait du Climategate)
“Personellement, j’ai cessé de leur répondre, ils vont avoir editoriaux ici et là, mais la chose importante est d’être sûr qu’il perdent la bataille des relations publiques, c’est à ça que sert le site [Realclimate.com]”

Et la meilleure façon de manipuler les masses est en utilisant la peur. Une fois la peur installée, les faits et la logique ne comptent plus.

Paul Watson, un des fondateurs de Greenpeace, CEO et fondateur de Sea Shepherd: « Ça n’a pas d’importance ce qui est vrai, ce qui est important c’est que que les gens croient qui est vrai »

Aujourd’hui
Depuis quelques années, les médias renchérissent de propagande catastrophiste ridicule presque chaque jour, dans le but de faire peur aux gens. Il n’y a qu’à se rappeler l’hystérie à cause du vidéo un vieil ours polaire amaigri que National Geographic s’est empressé de lier au réchauffement climatique, et qui a été vu par 2,5 milliards de personnes.

Ce qui a été démenti plus tard, c’était juste un ours malade (la population d’ours polaire se porte très bien) , ou même cette semaine, Netflix qui montre des morses qui sautent en bas d’une falaise vers la mort, disant que c’était à cause du réchauffement climatique, alors qu’il a été démontré rapidement qu’ils se sauvaient d’une attaque d’ours polaires.

Jim Sibbison, journaliste environnemental, ex-relationiste pour L’Agence de Protection de l’Environnement (EPA): « Nous écrivions des histoires de peur de façon routinière … Nos rapports de presse étaient plus ou moins vrais .. Nous étions là pour fouetter le public dans un frénésie à propos de l’environnement.«


On sent la panique, on sent qu’ils ne savent plus quoi faire pour faire taire cette montée de scepticisme. Même Facebook s’est mis à censurer un article de Patrick Moore (scientifique, écologiste, ex-co-fondateur de Greenpeace) parce qu’il dénoncait cette arnaque. Et les médias sociaux sont depuis quelques semaines à censurer tout ce qui est conservateur, nationaliste, climatosceptique, ou qui critique l’islam ou la théorie du genre. Ils ont peur parce que les gens n’écoutent plus la bonne parole des « élites » gauchistes dans leur tour d’ivoire.

Très bientôt, l’arnaque réchauffiste sera exposé comme étant la plus grande fraude de l’histoire de l’humanité. Toutes les prédictions faites sur le CO2 et l’impact de l’humain ont été fausses, simplement parce que les vrais facteurs qui influencent le climat sont naturels: cycles orbitaux, cycles solaires et cycles océaniques. Combinés ensemble, ces cycles nous donnent le climat. Mais ils sont tous naturels, l’humain n’a rien à y voir. Le soleil ammorce un des cycles les plus calmes depuis 200 ans (cycle 25), le refoidissement commence. Ils vont essayer de dire que le froid est quand même la faute du réchauffement, mais les gens commencent à réaliser que c’est une arnaque qui ne sert qu’à contrôler et taxer.
L’opinion publique commence tranquillement à se retourner contre eux, les scientifiques qu’ils essayaient de faire taire commencent à sortir de l’ombre, malgré les tentatives de censure des médias (Radio-Canada refuse tout sceptique sur les ondes) et médias sociaux (Censure sur Facebook, Youtube et Google) qui ont commencé.

Ils sont en mode panique, trop d’argent est en jeu, mais aussi des réputations de gens, de scientifiques, de journalistes, de politiciens et de médias qui se sont investit là dedans à fond. Mais ce n’est qu’une question de temps avant qu’ils perdent la bataille. Ca sera un scandale majeur. Mais une fois que ça sera exposé, qu’est-ce qui va arriver?

Conséquences?

Ca ne sera la faute de personne, les politiciens vont mettre la faute sur des scientifiques, dont beaucoup ne faisaient que profiter de la manne et émettaient les conclusions qui leur permettaient d’avoir accès à plus de fonds de recherche. D’ailleurs, ils n’avaient pas vraiment le choix, s’ils publiaient quelque chose qui contredisait l’agenda politique, ils risquaient de perdre leur emploi. C’est arrivé souvent. Un scientifique, pour pouvoir travailler, doit la plupart du temps accéder à des fonds de recherche, et ces fonds de recherche étaient octroyés à ceux qui appuyaient le dogme. Ceux qui ont osé parler contre ont perdu leur
emplois ou l’accès aux fonds de recherche, ont été menacés, insultés et leurs réputations salies.

Personne ne va dire qu’il savait que c’était faux, ils vont tous jouer les vierges offensées et mettre la faute sur d’autres. Personne ne sera tenu responsable. Personne ne va rembourser les millions de millairds qui ont été dilapidés. L’ONU ne va pas rembourser les centaines de milliards (100 milliards par an) qui y a été envoyé pour « combattre le climat », les gouvernements ne vont pas demander d’être remboursé pour les milliards en subventions aux énergies vertes, et ne va pas rembourser les milliards pris dans les poches des citoyens en taxes vertes et carbones. Les organimes environnementalistes ne vont pas rembourser les dons qu’ils ont reçu durant leur campagnes de peur « climatiques ».

Les répercussions vont être majeures.
Puisque ça ne sera la faute de « personne », les citoyens seront en colère contre « la science », même si seulement un faible pourcentage des scientifiques étaient à l’origine de cette arnaque, et ne prendront plus rien au sérieux quand il sera dit que quelque chose est « scientifiquement prouvé ». Le peuple va être en colère contre les gouvernements, même si les politiciens diront qu’ils ont été trompés, alors que la majorité d’entre-eux le savait très bien et en profitait. Même les organismes environnementalistes ne seront pas épargné et vont perdre beaucoup en crédibilité. Les gens seront tellement désabusé, ils ne croiront plus rien et ils risquent malheureusement de se réfugier dans la pseudo-science, la religion, ou des croyances anti-science (anti-vaccins etc.)

La dérive de l’hystérie climatique dans les dernières décennies a deux causes principales:
1- Les politiciens se sont rendu compte que s’appuyer sur la science leur permettait de faire passer n’importe quoi en disant que c’était « scientifiquement prouvé ». Ils pouvaient donc imposer contrôles et taxes sans que le peuple ne se rebelle. (Ce n’est plus le cas depuis les gilets jaunes qui se sont rebellé contre la taxe carbone en France)
2- Le gouvernement est devenu la quasi unique source de financement de la science. Qui contrôle le financement, contrôle souvent la conclusion. Dès que quelqu’un était financé autrement que par le gouvernement, il était dit être « payé par l’industrie » et que donc ses conclusions ne pouvait qu’être fausses. Mais pourquoi ceux qui étaient financés par le gouvernment, qui devaient suivre l’agenda politique eux, n’était-ils pas questionnés sur leur intégrité ou leur conclusion biaisée?

La politique ne doit jamais se mêler de la science, il y a eu des exmples passé qui ont été désastreux, comme au temps ou la religion était le principal pouvoir et pouvait contrôler la science qui la contredisait (Gallilée, Coppernic, etc.) ou même l’état d’Indiana qui avait voulu légiférer et statuer que la valeur de PI serait maintenant 3,2. (Voir : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill )

Le financement de la science doit se faire « no strings attached », et inconditionnellement des résultats. Sans quoi on se rapprochoche du Lyssenkisme ( Voir absolument: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyssenkisme )

La science au service de la politique n’aurait jamais du exister. La science doit être indépandante de l’influence des politiciens. Il est trop tard dans le cas présent et les dommages seront probablement très importants pour la réputation et la crédibilité de la science.


Censure Facebook et « fact checkers »

25/03/2019

Ce matin, j’ai recu une notification de facebook comme quoi un article que j’ai publié était « Faux » et donc la visibilité de ma page allait être diminuée. C’est sans appel.

Article en question que j’ai partagé sur la page Facebook de mon Blog:
« Patrick Moore est un écologiste et un scientifique, très différent d’un environnementaliste (qui est une idéologie politique) »
https://www.dreuz.info/2019/03/13/patrick-moore-ex-greenpeace-canada-bien-sur-quil-y-a-un-changement-climatique-il-existe-depuis-le-debut-des-temps/?fbclid=IwAR2TKOOOWy383KJghcnCdDYlFwCkMfda3c-9ZNwt-CUYfJk-CMc5AolrjYw
Dreuz est un site à contre-courant, mais le contenu de cet article en particulier était véridique. S’ils voulaient vraiment couper les Fake news, il faudrait commencer par les mainstream médias comme CNN, MSNBC, BBC, Radio-Canada, et.. LeMonde. CNN dit chaque jour depuis plus de 2 ans que Trump avait fait de la collusion avec la Russie pour influencer le résultat des élections, sans jamais pouvoir donner aucune aucune preuve. Et le rapport de Muller vient de sortir et innocenter complètement Donald Trump. Qu’est-ce que fait CNN?, ils en remettent et disent que c’est un cover-up. Ca c’est du fake news!

« Les décodeurs du monde » (lemonde.fr), qui est un des fact checker utilisé par Facebook, disent que l’article que j’ai partagé est un fake news, en se servant d’un de leur propres articles comme référence:
https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2019/03/22/pourquoi-la-responsabilite-humaine-dans-le-rechauffement-climatique-n-a-rien-d-un-canular-contrairement-a-ce-que-soutient-donald-trump_5439989_4355770.html?fbclid=IwAR08N4S-5tkYXyB71f9u762B1kei0J8j7jeYi42Sb21GzdDyPU6rcR3DNqE

Leur article de rhétorique est épouvatablement biaisé et factuellement incorrect.

J’ai bien sur essayé de contacter les supposés Fact checker en question, avec un court message « à chaud » sous le coup de la colère. Ils m’ont répondu:

>>> « SENECAT, Adrien » 2019-03-25 08:46 >>>
Bonjour Christian,

Nous avons effectivement publié un article qui explique pourquoi Patrick Moore n’est pas fondateur de Greenpeace, et pourquoi sa négation de la responsabilité humaine dans le réchauffement climatique est contredite par les faits.

Facebook tient compte de nos conclusions pour avertir les lecteurs des articles qui relaient cette rumeur. A aucun moment il n’y a « censure » comme vous l’affirmez.

Cordialement,

Adrien Sénécat


Ce à quoi je leur ai réopondu:


Vous êtes épouvatablement biaisé et vous démontrez que vous n’avez aucune compétence pour être « fact checker ». Je suis désolé pour ma réaction « à chaud » quand j’ai été informé de cette censure ce matin, je vais tenter d’être plus clair:

Vous osez remettre en question un article à propos de Patrick Moore, un scientifique, écologiste(diplômé), co-fondateur de Greenpeace, en disant que le réchauffement climatique causé par l’humain est un « fait », alors que vous n’avez aucune compétence scientifique sur le sujet. En plus, vous osez citer comme référence un article de votre propre média, qui est épouvantablement biaisé et qui est textbook fake news.

Juste le début donne le ton:

« Le site d’extrême droite américain « Breitbart » nie le réchauffement climatique en citant un « fondateur de Greenpeace ». Une intox grossière reprise par Trump. »

Dire que Breitbart est « extrème droite », mettre « fondateur de Greenpeace » entre guillemets pour mettre en doute (alors qu’il est réellement un des co-fondateurs) « intox grossièrement reprise par Trump », etc.. S’il y a un article de fake news, c’est bien celui du Monde….

Et oui c’est de la censure, parce que Facebook m’explique clairement ce matin que plus je vais publier de contenu comme ça, plus la visibilité de ma page sera restreinte. Mon blog est spécialisé pour exposer les failles de cette arnaque en utilisant du contenu provenant de papiers scientifiques et de scientifiques reconnus. Aussi bien dire que bientôt, plus personne ne verra ma page.

Vous êtes en train de devenir complice de la dictature de la pensée unique, une honte pour un média qui se doit d’être objectif. Et qu’est-ce qui va arriver quand cette foutue arnaque de réchauffement sera démontrée comme étant tout simplement des cycles naturels? Vous aurez fait un tort irréparrable à la liberté d’expression et vous aurez été parmis les collabos globalistes qui se servent de cette arnaque pour justifier taxes et contrôle.

Vous osez dire que ce sont des « faits » alors que vous n’y connaissez rien. Cette arnaque est purement politique et n’a plus rien à voir avec la science. Les gourous réchauffistes sont tous des politiciens, des jeunes socialistes et des artistes, pas des scientifiques. Alors que les leaders sceptiques sont majoritairement des scientifiques. Les infos toxiques sur lesquelle vous vous basez sont les véritables fake news.

Faits:
-Non, il n’y a plus de réchauffement statistiquement significatif (hormis quelques pics causés par El Nino, cycle naturel océanique) depuis 1998, prouvé par les données satellitaires. Il y a même une faible tendance au refroidissement qui commence.
-Oui le réchauffement de 1 degré depuis 100 ans à existé, mais il n’a absolument rien d’exceptionnel comparé aux cycles passés, tant en amplitude qu’en rapidité. En fait il est le moins chaud de tous les cycles (optimums médiéval, romain, minoéen, holocène) depuis la fin de la dernière ère glaciaire. (voir annexe)
-Le truc utilisé par les réchauffistes est de partir toujours de 1880 comme référence, alors que 1880, c’est juste à la fin du Little Ice Age, une des périodes les plus froides depuis 8000 ans. Il est normal que ça se soit réchauffé un peu par la suite, rien à voir avec l’activité humaine. (voir annexe)
-L’effet du CO2 a été grandement exagéré à des fins politiques, son effet de serre devient pratiquement nul passé 400ppm (taux actuel) et est insignifiant comparé au principal GES: la vapeur d’eau.
-Le CO2 à un impact insignifiant comparé à la variabilité naturelle: les cycles solaires et océaniques ont des impacts beaucoup plus importants.
-L’humain n’est responsable que de 3% des émissions annuelles de CO2, tout le reste est naturel (dégazage des océans, volcans sous-marins, respiration animale etc..) et la durée de vie dans l’atmosphère du CO2 n’est que de 5 ans (contrairement a ce qu’affirme le GIEC en disant que c’est des centaines d’années).
-Jamais il n’y a eu de consensus de « 97% des scientifiques » sur le sujet, si vous saviez d’où ça vient, vous auriez honte d’y avoir cru.
-Le GIEC n’est pas une source fiable ni crédible. Le processus du GIEC est de sélectionner des articles scientifiques qui disent ce qu’ils veulent entendre, ensuite les réécrire (chaque ligne est scrutée à la loupe et modifiée pour être « acceptable ») et ensuite ils en font un résumé pour les décideurs (propagande pour les politiciens), qui eux ensuite décident d’envoyer plus de 100 milliards par an à l’ONU.

Si vous ne comprenez pas ce que j’ai écris, vous ne devriez pas être fact checker sur tout ce qui touche la science du climat.

« Unfortunately the global warming hysteria, as I see it, is driven by politics more than by science »
-Freeman Dyson, un des plus grands scientifique de notre ère.

En Annexe: Température depuis la fin de la dernière ère glacaire:

Tous les mainstream médias ont ignoré cette sortie de Patrick Moore, parce que ca contredit leur agenda et ce qu’ils répètent comme des perroquets depuis des décennies, alors c’est normal que ça soit des sites plus marginaux, ou conservateurs qui sortent l’histoire. Ce que les Facts Checker font c’est du damage control pour le compte de Greenpeace et des orgasnismes réchauffistes.

Ce genre de censure est extrèmement dangereux, c’est le début de la dictature de la pensée unique. La censure est le début de la dictature.

Note: Plus d’infos sur monsieur le Fact Checker, et on voit très bien un biais important, ca resemble plus à un activiste qu’une personne neutre et objective:
https://www.lemonde.fr/journaliste/adrien-senecat/


Manifesto de l’attaque des mosquées en Nouvelle-Zélande.

18/03/2019

Lors de l’attaque terroriste des mosquées, un manifeste a été envoyé aux médias et au politiciens. J’avais eu l’occasion d’en lire une bonne partie. Mais quand les médias ont commencé à publier plein de fake news, disant que l’auteur des attaques était un Nazi, un « white supremacist » d’extrème-droite et un « Trump supporter », je savais que c’était des fakes news, parce que j’avais lu le manifeste, et que ça ne correspondait pas du tout. Puis quand j’ai voulu écrire un texte la dessus et exposer le biais médiatique, plus moyen de trouver le manifeste en question. Il m’a fallu des heures et j’ai fini par trouver non pas une copie originale du document, mais un copier/coller texte dans un forum. Je peux valider que ça correpond avec ce que j’avais lu, alors je suppose qu’il doit être complet.

NOTE: Avant de lire le document: Il est clair que ne suis pas d’accord avec ce type qui a commit un acte terroriste immonde et tué des innocents, je publie ce texte pour exposer un biais médiatique idéologique. J’ai réarrangé et mis en page le texte pour qu’il soit plus lisible, c’est tout, aucune modification du contenu. Faites votre propre analyse entre le contenu de ce texte, et la couverture médiatique. Oui il y a des choses vraies sur lequel ce type s’appuie, mais sa conclusion et surtout les méthodes choisies ne sont pas acceptables.

Voici le document complet, et puis vers la fin, je commente des extraits.

Le Document commence ici:
—————————————————————————————

The Great Replacement

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright.
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears,
I pray. Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Introduction
It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates. It’s the birthrates. If there is one thing I want you to remember from these writings, its that the birthrates must change. Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death. Every day we become fewer in number, we grow older,we grow weaker. In the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us. To maintain a population the people must achieve a birthrate that reaches replacement fertility levels. In the Western world this is roughly 2.06 births per woman.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate

There is not a single Western country, not a single white nation, that reaches these levels. Not in Europe, not in the Americas, not in Australia or New Zealand. White people are failing to reproduce, failing to create families, failing to have children. But despite this sub-replacement fertility rate, the population in the West is increasing, and rapidly. How is this possible?
Mass immigration and the higher fertility rates of the immigrants themselves are causing this increase in population. We are experiencing an invasion on a level never seen before in history. Millions of people pouring across our borders, legally.Invited by the state and corporate entities to replace the White people who have failed to reproduce, failed to create the cheap labour, new consumers and tax base that the corporations and states need to thrive. This crisis of mass immigration and sub-replacement fertility is an assault on the European people that, if not combated, will ultimately result in the complete racial and cultural replacement of the European people. To see this in full effect, you only have to look at the population statistics in Western nations for the year 2100.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_future_population_(United_Nations,_medium_fertility_variant)

In 2100,despite the ongoing effect of sub-replacement fertility,the population figures show that the population does not decrease inline with the sub-replacement fertility levels, but actually maintains and, even in many White nations, rapidly increases. All through immigration. This is ethnic replacement. This is cultural replacement. This is racial replacement. This is WHITE GENOCIDE. To return to replacement fertility levels is priority number one. But it is no simple task.There are myriad reasons behind the decline in fertility rates and the destruction of the traditional family unit. We must inevitably correct the disaster of hedonistic,nihilistic individualism. But it will take take some time, time we do not have due to the crisis of mass immigration. Due to mass immigration we lack the time scale required to enact the civilizational paradigm shift we need to undertake to return to health and prosperity. Mass immigration will disenfranchise us,subvert our nations, destroy our communities, destroy our ethnic binds, destroy our cultures, destroy our peoples. Long before low fertility levels ever could.Thus, before we deal with the fertility rates, we must deal with both the invaders within our lands and the invaders that seek to enter our lands. We must crush immigration and deport those invaders already living on our soil. It is not just a matter of our prosperity, but the very survival of
our people.

Answering possible questions

1.In general

Who are you?

Just a ordinary White man,28 years old. Born in Australia to a working class,low income family. My parents are of Scottish,Irish and English stock. I had a regular childhood, without any great issues. I had little interest in education during my schooling, barely achieving a passing grade. I did not attend University as I had no great interest in anything offered in the Universities to study. I worked for a short time before making some money investing in Bitconnect, then used the money from the investment to travel. More recently I have been working part time as a kebab removalist. I am just a regular White man, from a regular family. Who decided to take a stand to ensure a future for my people.

Why did you carry out the attack?
To most of all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people. To take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history. To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers. To take revenge for the thousands of European lives lost to terror attacks throughout European lands. To take revenge for Ebba Akerlund. To directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves. To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. To incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil. To avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up. To agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash. To show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.A path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone. To create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic,powerful and revolutionary action can occur. To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought. To drive a wedge between the nations of NATO that are European and the Turks that also make a part of the NATO forces, thereby turning NATO once more into a united European army and pushing the Turkey once more back to the true position of a foreign, enemy force. Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states.This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream. Furthermore this balkanization will also reduce the USA’s ability to project power globally, and thereby ensure that never again can such a situation as the US involvement in Kosovo ever occur again(where US/NATO forces fought beside muslims and slaughtered Christian
Europeans attempting to remove these Islamic occupiers from Europe).

What do you want?
We must ensure the existence of our people, and a future for white children.

Was there a particular event or reason you decided to commit to a violent attack?
There was a period of time 2 years prior to the attack to the attack that dramatically changed my views.The period of time was from, beginning of April,2017 until the end May,2017. In this time period a series of events broke down my own reserves, my reservations, my cynicism and revealed the truth of the Wests current situation. These events turned my thoughts from pursuing a democratic, political solution and finally caused the revelation of the truth, that a violent, revolutionary solution is the only possible solution to our current crisis. I was travelling as a tourist in Western Europe at the time, France, Spain Portugal and others.The first event that begun the change was the terror attack in Stockholm, on the 7 th of April 2017. It was another terror attack in the seemingly never ending attacks that had been occurring on a regular basis throughout my adult life. But for some reason this was different. The jaded cynicism with which I had greeted previous attacks didn’t eventuate. Something that had been a part of my life for as long as I could remember, cynicism in the face of attacks on the West by islamic invaders, was suddenly no longer there. I could no longer bring the sneer to my face, I could no longer turn my back on the violence. Something, this time, was different. That difference was Ebba Akerlund. Young, innocent and dead Ebba. Ebba was walking to meet her mother after school, when she was murdered by an Islamic attacker, driving a stolen vehicle through the shopping promenade on which she was walking. Ebba was partially deaf, unable to hear the attacker coming. Ebba death at the hands of the invaders, the indignity of her violent demise and my inability to stop it broke through my own jaded cynicism like a sledgehammer. I could no longer ignore the attacks. They were attacks on my people, attacks on my culture, attacks on my faith and attacks on my soul. They would not be ignored. The second event was the 2017 French General election. The candidates
were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast,feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who’s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. Despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.The internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. It wasn’t even close. The truth of the political situation in Europe was suddenly impossible to accept.My despair set in.My belief in a democratic solution vanished. The final push was witnessing the state of French cities and towns. For many years I had been hearing and reading of the invasion of France by non-whites, many of these rumours and stories I believed to be exaggerations, created to push a political narrative. But once I arrived in France, I found the stories to not only be true, but profoundly understated. In every french city, in every french town the invaders were there. No matter where I travelled, no matter how small or rural the community I visited, the invaders were there. The french people were often in a minority themselves, and the french that were in the streets were often alone, childless or of advanced age. Whilst the immigrants were young, energized and with large families and many children. I remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in Eastern France, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. As I sat there in the parking lot, in my rental car, I watched a stream of the invaders walk through the shopping centre’s front doors. For every french man or woman there was double the number of invaders. I had seen enough, and in anger, drove out of the the town, refusing to stay any longer in the cursed place and headed on to the next town. Driving toward the next french town on my itinerary, knowing that inevitably the invaders would also been there, I found my emotions swinging between fuming rage and suffocating despair at the indignity of the invasion of France, the pessimism of the french people, the loss of culture and identity and the farce of the political solutions offered. I came upon a cemetery, one of the many mass cemeteries created to bury the French and other European soldiers lost in the Wars that crippled Europe. I had seen many pictures and heard many people discuss the cemeteries, but even knowing about these cemeteries in advance, I was still not
prepared for the sight. Simple, white, wooden crosses stretching from the fields beside the roadway, seemingly without end, into the horizon. Their number uncountable, the representation of their loss unfathomable. I pulled my rental car over, and sat, staring at these crosses and contemplating how it was that despite these men and womens sacrifice, despite their bravery, we had still fallen so far.I broke into tears, sobbing alone in the car, staring at the crosses, at the forgotten dead. Why were we allowing these soldiers deaths to be in vain? Why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? Overcome us? Without a single shot fired in response? WHY WON’T SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING? In front of those endless crosses, in front of those dead soldiers lost in forgotten wars, my despair turned to shame,my shame to guilt,my guilt to anger and my anger to rage. WHY WON’T SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING? WHY WON’T SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING? WHY DON’T I DO SOMETHING? The spell broke, why don’t I do something? Why not me? If not me, then who? Why them when I could do it myself? It was there I decided to do something, it was there I decided to take action, to commit to force.To commit to violence. To take the fight to the invaders myself.

Who do you represent?
Millions of European and other ethno-nationalist peoples that wish to live in peace amongst their own people, living in their own lands, practicing their own traditions and deciding the future of their own kind.

Are you a part of any political groups or movements?

I am not a direct member of any organization or group, though I have donated to many nationalist groups and have interacted with many more.

Did the groups you support/are aligned with order or promote your attack?
No.No group ordered my attack, I make the decision myself. Though I did contact the reborn Knights Templar for a blessing in support of the attack, which was given.

Do these groups hold power/who are the people in these groups?
The total number of people in these organizations is in the millions, the total number of groups in the thousands. People from every walk of life, in every place of employment and field but disproportionately employed in military services and law enforcement. Unsurprisingly ethno-nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community. I would estimate the number of soldiers in European armed forces that also belong to nationalist groups to number in the hundreds of thousands, with just as many employed in law enforcement positions.

Did you carry out the attack for fame?
No, carrying out an attack for fame would be laughable.After all who can remember the name of the attackers in the September 11 attack in New York? How about the attack on the pentagon? The attackers in the plane that crashed into the field on the same day? I will be forgotten quickly. Which I do not mind. After all I am a private and mostly introverted person. But the aftershock from my actions will ripple for years to come, driving political and social discourse, creating the atmosphere or fear and change that is required.

Why did you target those people?
They were an obvious,visible and large group of invaders, from a culture with higher fertility rates, higher social trust and strong, robust traditions that seek to occupy my peoples lands and ethnically replace my own people.

For how long did you plan this attack?

I begun planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in Christchurch
three months in advance.

Why did you choose this time to attack?

The best time to attack was yesterday, the next best time is today. The attack was planned to allow enough time to train, form a plan, settle my affairs, write down my views, then enact the attack.

Why did you choose to use firearms?
I could have chosen any weapons or means.A TATP filled rental van. Household flour, a method of dispersion and an ignition source.A ballpeen hammer and a wooden shield.Gas,fire,vehicular attacks,plane attacks, any means were available. I had the will and I had the resources. I chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world. The US is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to
abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty. This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic
polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.

Why did you choose New Zealand as a place to attack?
New Zealand was not the original choice for attack, I only arrived to New Zealand to live temporarily whilst I planned and trained, but I soon found out that New Zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the West. Secondly an attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration.

Was there any reason you attacked that(those) mosque(s) in particular?
Originally the mosque in Dunedin was the main target,particularly after watching the video on their facebook page named “Otago muslim association”
https://www.facebook.com/Otago-Muslim-Association-206778229358786/ The video war entitled “Very interesting video. Only for Muslims. Please do not redistribute” that proved their knowledge of their actions, and their guilt. https://www.facebook.com/206778229358786/videos/451628238207116/
But after visiting the mosques in Christchurch and Linwood and seeing the desecration of the church that had been converted to a mosque in Ashburton, my plans changed. The Christchurch and Linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students,more adults and a prior history of extremism. Attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in Ashburton, whilst I am unsure as of this time of writing whether I will reach that target, it was a bonus objective.

Do you consider it a terrorist attack?
By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force.

Do you feel any remorse for the attack?
No, I only wish I could have killed more invaders, and more traitors as well.

Did/do you personally hate muslims?
A muslim man or woman living in their homelands? No. A muslim man or woman choosing to invade our lands live on our soil and replace our people? Yes, I dislike them. The only muslim I truly hate is the convert, those from our own people that turn their backs on their heritage, turn their backs on their cultures, turn their back on their traditions and became blood traitors to their own race. These I hate.

Did/do you personally hate foreigners/other cultures?
No, I spent many years travelling through many, many nations. Everywhere I travelled, barring a few small exceptions, I was treated wonderfully, often as a guest and even as a friend. The varied cultures of the world greeted me with warmth and compassion, and I very much enjoyed nearly every moment I spent with them. I wish the different peoples of their world all the best regardless of their ethnicity, race, culture of faith and that they live in peace and prosperity, amongst their own people, practicing their own traditions, in their own nations. But, if those same people seek to come to my peoples lands, replace my people, subjugate my people, make war upon on my people, ,hen I shall
be forced to fight them, and hold nothing in reserve.

Do you believe those you attacked were innocent?

They are no innocents in an invasion, all those who colonize other peoples lands share guilt.

Did you commit the attack to receive media coverage and to propagate your own writings/beliefs/ideals?
No, the attack was a end in itself, with all the necessary affect required. These writing, and their coverage, are just a bonus.

Did you intend to survive the attack?
Yes, but death was a definite possibility. These situations are chaotic and virtually impossible to control, no matter the planning. Survival was a better alternative to death in order to further spread my ideals by media coverage and to deplete resources from the state by my own imprisonment.

Was the attack “racist” in origin?
Fertility rates are innately tied to race, so yes. There was a racial component to the attack.

Was the attack “xenophobic” in orgin?
Fertility rates are cultural, there is no denying that, so there was a war of cultures being fought by the invaders, and my attack was a response to this. Though I hold no great fear or distrust of other peoples.

Was the attack “islamophobic” in origin?
Islamic nations in particular have high birth rates, regardless of race or ethnicity, and in this there was an anti-islamic motivation to the attacks, as well as a want for revenge against islam for the 1300 years of war and devastation that it has brought upon the people of the West and other peoples of the world.

Was the attack anti-immigration in origin?
Yes, beyond all doubt, anti-immigration, anti-ethnic replacement and anti-cultural replacement.

Was the attack anti-diversity in origin?
No, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity. To ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique,undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. To ensure that the peoples of the world remain true to their traditions and faiths and do not become watered down and corrupted by the influence of outsiders. The attack was to ensure a preservation of beauty, art and tradition. In my mind a rainbow is only beautiful to due its variety of colours, mix the colours together and you destroy them all and they are gone forever and the end result is far from anything beautiful.

Did you intend to kill police officers or other enforcers of the state?

No.The police force in New Zealand is on overall good terms with the public and, unlike in other European nations such as France, the UK, or Norway they have so far remained loyal to the people.So harming the NZ police officers was to be avoided at all costs unless the state enforcer was from an invaders background. Striking quickly and then exfiltrating from the area of attack was the plan, to avoid the responders of the state and to avoid a situation where I was forced to harm them. In the event of an engagement I had the somewhat quixotic notion of shouting down responding state enforcers, intimidating them into dropping their weapons and if that failed, only targeting non-vital areas of their body such as the anterior of the thigh, shoulder or a side-on through shot of the calf, hamstring or gluteal muscles so as to cause the least amount of harm as possible and to allow for a quick recovery. How this worked in reality, well…only you know.

If you survived, did you intend to go to trial?
Yes, and to plead not guilty.The attack was a partisan action against a occupying force, and I am a lawful, uniformed combatant.

Were there other targets planned in your attack?
Many, one thing that can be said about the current state of the West is that we live in a target rich environment, traitors and enemies abound.

Were/are you are “racist”?

Yes,by definition, as I believe racial differences exist between peoples and they have a great impact on the way we shape our societies I also believe fertility rates are part of those racial differences and that the immigrants in our lands with high fertility must be forced out to ensure the existance of our race. So yes. I am a racist.

Were/are you a “xenophobe”?
No, no culture scares me. I am only wary of those cultures with higher fertility rates replacing others.

Were/are you a “islamophobe”?
No, I am not afraid of islam, only that, due to its high fertility rates, it will grow to replace other peoples and faiths.

Were/are you a nationalist?
Yes, predominantly an ethno-nationalist(I place importance on the health and well being of my race above all else).

Were/are you a nazi?
No, actual nazis do not exist.They haven’t been a political or social force anywhere in the world for more than 60 years.

Were/are you an anti-semite?
No.A jew living in israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people.

Were/are you a neo-nazi?
That is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. So no, I don’t believe so.

Were/are you a conservative?
No, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it.

Were/are you a christian?
That is complicated. When I know, I will tell you.

Were/are you a fascist?
Yes. For once, the person that will be called a fascist, is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that. I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature. The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.

Was there a political figure or party in history you most associate yourself with?
Sir Oswald Mosley is the person from history closest to my own beliefs.

Were/are you a “homophobe”?
No, I simply do not care all that much what gay people do.As long as they are loyal to their people and place their peoples well being first, then I have no issues.

Were/are you “right wing”?
Depending on the definition, sure.

Were/are you “left wing”?
Depending on the definition, sure.

Were/are you a socialist?
Depending on the definition. Worker ownership of the means of production? It depends on who those workers are, their intents, who currently owns the means of production, their intents and who currently owns the state, and its intents.

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?
As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

Were/are you a supporter of Brexit?
Yes, though not for an official policy made. The truth is that eventually people must face the fact that it wasn’t a damn thing to do with the economy.That it was the British people firing back at mass immigration, cultural displacement and globalism, and that’s a great and wonderful thing.

Were/are you a supporter of Front National?
No,they’re a party of milquetoast civic nationalist boomers, completely incapable of creating real change and with no actual viable plan to save their nation.

By living in New Zealand, weren’t you an immigrant yourself?
Yes, and it seems we immigrants seem to bring a whole host of issues. Nah, not really.An Australian living in New Zealand is much the same as an Austrian living in Bavaria. They aren’t going to ethnically replace the people, nor change the nations culture.They are the same people, they are the same culture.

Are you intolerant?
Sure. The last virtues of a dying nation are tolerance and apathy, and I want none of it.

How did you develop/research/receive your views and beliefs?

Over a great deal of time, from a great deal of places.

From where did you receive/research/develop your beliefs?
The internet, of course. You will not find the truth anywhere else.

Is there a particular person that radicalized you the most?

Yes, the person that has influenced me above all was Candace Owens. Each time she spoke I was stunned by her insights and her own views helped push me further and further into the belief of violence over meekness. Though I will have to disavow some of her beliefs, the extreme actions she calls for are too much, even for my tastes.

Were you taught violence and extremism by video games,music,literature,cinema?

Yes, Spyro the dragon 3 taught me ethno-nationalism. Fortnite trained me to be a killer and to floss on the corpses of my enemies. No.

Did you always hold these views?
No, when I was young I was a communist, then an anarchist and finally a libertarian before coming to be an eco-fascist.

Who do you consider white?
Those that are ethnically and culturally European.

Who do you consider non-white?
Those who are not ethnically and culturally European.

Where your beliefs given to you by your family/friends/society etc?
No. Those around my were the typical Australians, apathetic and for the most part apolitical, only truly showing motivation in matters of animal rights, environmentalism and taxation.

Do you consider yourself a leader?
No, just a partisan.

Did/do you have ties to any other partisans/freedom fighters/ethno soldiers?
I support many of those that take a stand against ethnic and cultural genocide.Luca Traini, Anders Breivik, Dylan Roof, Anton Lundin Pettersson, Darren Osbourne etc. But I have only had brief contact with Knight Justiciar Breivik, receiving a blessing for my mission after contacting his brother knights.

Were your beliefs influenced by any other attackers?
I have read the writings of Dylan Roof and many others, but only really took true inspiration from Knight Justiciar Breivik.

If convicted, do you expect to stay in prison?
Yes, until I am either killed, released or enough time passes and the greater situation is an obvious defeat of our people.Then I will commit suicide, happy in the knowledge I did my best to prevent the death of my race.

Why do you believe you will be released from prison?
I do not just expected to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize.As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime.

Why do you care so much about Europe, aren’t you an Australian?
Australia, just like the rest of the colonies of Europe, is simply an off-shoot of the European people. A finger on the hand of the body of Europe. The origins of my language is European, my culture is European, my political beliefs are European, my philosophical beliefs are European, my identity is European and, most importantly, my blood is European.

2.Answers to my people/supporters questions

What are your views?
I am an Ethno-nationalist Eco-fascist. Ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature, and the natural order.

Who do you follow?
No one person in particular, I support many groups but I am a member of none.

Who do you support?
Those that wish a future for white children, and to ensure the existence of our people.

Are you a Fed/shill/mossad agent/false flag/patsy/infiltrator/antifa/glow in the dark etc?
No, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing. Just do not allow your scepticism to turn to paranoia and keep you from supporting those that want the best for you.

What are your wishes?
To ensure the existence of our people and a future for white children, whilst preserving and exulting nature and the natural order.

What do you encourage us to do?

Make your plans, get training, form alliances, get equipped and then act. The time for meekness has long since passed, the time for a political solution has long since passed. Men of the West must be men once more.

Is this your complete writings and views?
Unfortunately not, there was a much larger work written, roughly 240 pagies long that spoke on many issues and went into much depth, but in a moment of unbridled self criticism, I deleted the entire work and started again, two weeks before the attack itself. I was left with a short period of time to create a new work and only leave my views half finished. I will let my actions speak for themselves.

3.Answers to detractors and to those that oppose my beliefs/methods

Won’t your attack do more harm than good?
No, there isn’t a successful, influential grand movement established just yet, and no leading organizations, so there is no great structure created that could be brought to harm. As for how the public perceives us? Did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before?

Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from Whites in the United states?
Yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time.

Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights in the New Zealand?
The gun owners of New Zealand are a beaten, miserable bunch of baby boomers, who have long since given up the fight.When was the last time they won increased rights? Their loss was inevitable.I just accelerated things a bit. They had long since lost their cities, take a look at Auckland. Did you really expect they would not also lose their rights?

Democracy is the only solution, why are you committing to force?
Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our enemies. The global and corporate run press controls them, the education system(long since fallen to the long march through the institutions carried out by the marxists)controls them, the state(long since heavily lost to its corporate backers)controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory. Prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. Force is the only path to power and the only path to true victory.

Violence isn’t the answer, why are you using force?
There is no nation in the world that wasn’t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. Force is power. History is the history of power. Violence is power and violence is the reality of history.Wake up.

What makes you think that you have all the answers?
I don’t, but I may have some. Take from my views that which works, discard that which does not.Victory is all that matters.

What makes you believe you can speak for a group?
I speak for my views and my ideals, and those that support me.Some may agree with them, others won’t.

What makes you believe you are European, not just an Australian?
What is an Australian but a drunk European? Kidding, but Australian is a European colony, particularly of British stock and thereby an extension of Europe.

What makes you believe there are racial differences and that those differences matter?
Research and data. Haplogroups, phenotypes and globalized testing. In time, the truth will be revealed.

Why do you blame immigrants and not the capitalists?
I blame both, and plan to deal with both.

Why attack immigrants when “x” are the issue?
Because the “x” groups can be dealt with in time, but the high fertility immigrants will destroy us now, soon it is a matter of survival we destroy them first.

Why attack muslims if all high fertility immigrants are the issue?

Historical, societal and statistical reasons. They are the most despised group of invaders in the West, attacking them receives the greatest level of support. They are also one of the strongest groups, with high fertility, high in group preference and a will to conquer.

Why focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue?
Because they are the same issue, the environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.

If you believe we need to correct the white birth rates, why didn’t you start a family and do it yourself?
Because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing. We do not have the birth rates to fight them at their game, nor should we as it is ultimately destructive to nature and culture.So I took matters into my own hands.

Didn’t your attack just result in the vilification of ethno-nationalists/racial autonomists?
No, people will forget my motivations quickly and only remember the attack itself. Don’t believe me, can anymore tell you the motivation of the Madrid train bomber attackers?

Children are always innocent, do you not think you are a monster for killing an innocent?
Children of invaders do not stay children, they become adults and reproduce, creating more invaders to replace your people.They grow up and vote against your peoples own wishes, for the interests of their own people and identity. They grow up and take the potential homes of your own people for themselves, they occupy positions of power, remove wealth and destroy social trust. Any invader you kill, of any age, is one less enemy your children will have to face. Would you rather do the killing, or leave it to your children? Your grand children?


Section I

Addresses to various groups

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate. They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate. Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight. There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate. It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the state. No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate. It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

-Altered version of “The Beginnings” by Rudyard Kipling

To Conservatives

Ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve? What does it seek to conserve? The natural environment?Western Culture? Ethnic autonomy? Religion? The nation? The race? Nothing is conserved. The natural environment is industrialized, pulverized and commoditized. Western culture is trivialized, pulped and blended into a smear of meaningless nothing, with the only tenets and beliefs seemingly held to are the myth of the individual, the value of work (productivity for the benefit of your capitalist owners) and the sovereignty of private property (to ensure none of us get grand ideas of taking the unearned wealth of our owners). Ethnic autonomy? Destroyed in the name of cheap labour, whilst they may publicly object to the illegal immigration of the third world masses, privately they push for as much migration as possible, anything to decrease the labour cost of production and line their pockets with the profits. They removed the Europeans peoples autonomy and sovereignty for their own lust for power and wealth. Religion? What remains? Empty churches and full shopping centers? Drive through confessionals and no fault divorce? Any religious ideal that stood between the wealthy and wealth generation was downplayed, sidelined and quietly dismantled. All so that they could line their pockets without complaints or objections The nation? What nations do we have to conserve? What our own nations now based on? Their is no shared culture, ethnicity, language, values or beliefs. Anyone can be a member of our nation, as long as they have the paperwork. They need not be born here, share our race, our language, our culture or our beliefs. Hear the conservatives cry, as long as they are willing to WORK, let them in! Let them earn our wealthy benefactors their second yachts and their fifth properties! The Race? They don’t even BELIEVE in the race, they don’t even have the gall to say race exists. And above all they don’t even care if it does. It’s profit, and profit alone that drives them, all else is secondary. The notion of a racial future or destiny is as foreign to them as social responsibilities. Not a thing has been conserved other than corporate profits and the the ever increasing wealth of the 1% that exploit the people for their own benefit. Conservatism is dead. Thank god. Now let us bury it and move on tosomething of worth. CONSERVATISM IS DEAD, THANK GOD.

To Christians
“The people worthy of glory, the people blessed by God Our Lord, moan and fall under the weight of these outrages and most shameful humiliations. The race of the elect suffers outrageous persecutions, and the impious race of the Saracens respects neither the virgins of the Lord nor the colleges of priests. They run over the weak and the elderly, they seize the children from their mothers so that they might forget, among the barbarians, the name of God. That perverse nation profanes the hospices … The temple of the Lord is treated like a criminal and the ornaments of the sanctuary are robbed. “What more shall I say to you? “We are disgraced, sons and brothers, who live in these days of calamities!
Can we look at the world in this century reproved by Heaven to witness the desolation of the Holy City and remain in peace while it is so oppressed? Is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle? Let us all weep for our faults that raise the divine ire, yes, let us weep… But let not our tears be like the seed thrown into the sand. Let the fire of our repentance raise up the Holy War and the love of our brethren lead us into combat. Let our lives be stronger than death to fight against the enemies of the Christian people.” ASK YOURSELF, WHAT WOULD POPE URBAN II DO?

To Antifa/Marxists/Communists

I do not want to convert you, I do not want to come to an understanding. Egalitarians and those that believe in heirachy will never come to terms.I don’t want you by my side or I don’t want share power. I want you in my sights. I want your neck under my boot. SEE YOU ON THE STREETS YOU ANTI-WHITE SCUM

To turks

You can live in peace in your own lands, and may no harm come to you. On the east side of the Bosphorus. But if you attempt to live in European lands, anywhere west of the Bosphorus.We will kill you and drive you roaches from our lands. We are coming for Constantinople and we will destroy every mosque and minaret in the city. The Hagia Sophia will be free of minarets and Constantinople will be rightfully christian owned once more. FLEE TO YOUR OWN LANDS, WHILE YOU STILL HAVE THE CHANCE

Section II

General Thoughts and Potential Strategies
« It will come in one way and one way alone, not through existing governments. Not by the maneuvers of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. It will come in a great wave of popularity, in a great awakening of the European soul.”
-Sir Oswald Mosley

Who is truly to blame?

The people who are to blame most are ourselves, european men. Strong men do not get ethnically replaced, strong men do not allow their culture to degrade, strong men do not allow their people to die. Weak men have created this situation and strong men are needed to fix it. UNTIL THE HAGIA SOPHIA IS FREE OF THE MINARETS,THE MEN OF EUROPE ARE MEN IN NAME ONLY

The Rape of European Women Invaders
Many of you may already know about the rape of British women by the invading forces, Rotherham of course being the most well known case. But what few know is that Rotherham is just one of an ongoing trend of rape and molestation perpetrated by these non-white scum. A list of wikipedia entries from the most well known British rape cases follows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aylesbury_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banbury_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_grooming_gang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Doublet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_sex_abuse_case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

What many do not know is that these cases do not solely occur in Britain, but elsewhere in the Western world as well, as shown by these two well known cases in Australia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashfield_gang_rapes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_gang_rapes

And even in Finland:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulu_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

Just as shocking are the cases of open and public sexual assault and harassment performed by these invasive scum that appear to be occurring ever more frequently across the European world such as those in Germany in the New years eve sexual assaults in Cologne, Hamburg, Dortmund, Dusseldorf, Stuttgart and Bielefeld. The wikipedia entry of these events follows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_New_Year%27s_Eve_sexual_assaults_in_Germany

The true number of these events perpetrated across the Western world is unknown and certainly under reported, as both the state, the media and the judicial system work in unison to hide these atrocities, in the fear that knowledge of these events would enrage the native people of the West and damage the perception of our new “Multicultural utopia”. Finally I would like to send a message to the perpetrators of these attacks, and their families. You will hang. If you are released we will find you and
kill you, if you are in prison we will reach you there, if you try to hide these rapist scum we will kill you as well. For the disgrace you have heaped upon the European people and the distress you have caused to European women, you will die. KILL THE RAPISTS, HANG THEIR FAMILIES

Diversity is weak
Why is diversity said to be our greatest strength? Does anyone even ask why? It is spoken like a mantra and repeated ad infinitum “diversity is our greatest strength, diversity is our greatest strength, diversity is our greatest strength…”. Said throughout the media, spoken by politicians, educators and celebrities. But no one ever seems to give a reason why. What gives a nation strength? And how does diversity increase that strength? What part of diversity causes this increase in strength? No one can give an answer. Meanwhile the “diverse” nations across the world are scenes of endless social, political, religious and ethnic conflict. The United states is one of the most diverse nations on Earth, and they are about an inch away from tearing each other to pieces. Brazil with all its racial diversity is completely fractured as a nation, where people cannot get along and separate and self segregate whenever possible. South Africa with all its “diversity” is turning into a bloody backwater as its diversity increases, black on other black, black on white, white on black, black on Indian, doesn’t not matter, its ethnicity vs ethnicity. They all turn on each other in the end. Why is it that what gives Western nations strength(diversity)is not what gives Eastern nations(China, Japan, Taiwan,South Korea)their strength? How are they so strong, China set to be the worlds most dominant nation in this century, whilst lacking diversity? Why is that their non diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics? Diversity is not a strength. Unity, purpose, trust, traditions, nationalism and racial nationalism is what provides strength. Everything else is just a catchphrase. DIVERSITY IS WEAKNESS, UNITY IS STRENGTH

Radicalization of Western men
The radicalization of young Western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable. It should come as no shock that European men, in every nation, and on every continent are turning to radical notions and methods to combat the social and moral decay of their nations and the continued ethnic replacement of their people. Radical, explosive action is the only desired, and required, response to an attempted genocide. These men and women are not being being brain-washed, corrupted or misled. They are finally removing their blindfolds and seeing the reality of the the world and their peoples future. The truth that the West killed the notion of god, and proceeded to replace it with nothing. Brought forth two competing ideologies(communism and fascism)to replace this loss of god, then proceeded to allow both sides to slaughter each other to a standstill and then let corporate backed capitalists tear the survivor to pieces. Resulting in a society with no core beliefs, no purpose and no vision for the future. A society of rampant nihilism, consumerism and individualism, where every individual is a competitor and the rights of the individual override all notions of responsibility. In this hell the individual is all and the race is worthless, something to rail against and use whenever possible, a power structure to climb, or topple. The truth that they are rapidly becoming, not just a global minority, but a minority within their own lands. The Truth that they are left, alone, an individual in a society worshiping the cult of the individual, to respond against an influx of outsiders from all corners of the world. Enemies bound by faith, culture or tradition with higher levels of fertility, trust and in group preference resulting in much stronger communities. The truth that they are expected not to combat these myriad, unending and dedicated interlopers, but to embrace them, accept their own disenfranchisement, accept the loss of their fathers lands, their own impoverishment, their own REPLACEMENT. But they will not accept this death. This eradication of their people, their culture, their very soul. They see the decay all around them, plummeting,free-falling birth rates all across the Western world. Millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. Broken families with soaring divorce rates, that’s if they even bother to get married at all.Suicide rates climbing year by year, not just for adults, by even teens and children as well and the only time people seem to even notice is when one of their own idols commits the act(singers, sports stars, actors). Drug use at all levels of society, in all age groups, any source of distraction or relief to escape a culture of nihilism. Rampant urbanization and industrialization, ever expanding cities and shrinking forests, a complete removal of man from nature, with the obvious results. Pedophile politicians, pedophile priests and pedophile pop stars, demonstrating to all the true depravity of our age. Art and beauty subverted beyond all recognition, bauhaus travesties replacing nouveau wonders,soulless metropolitan architecture of glass and steel reflecting no society, no culture, no people and therefore belonging everywhere, and no where. Suicidal, nihilistic and degenerate pop icons produced from a dead culture: Michael Jackson(pedophile, self hating, self mutilating, opiod addict);Madonna(degenerate,drug addict, childless, whore, anti-christian, pro miscegenation) Kurt Cobain(suicidal, drug addict, self hater, anti-social), Freddy Mercury(lifelong identity crisis, lifelong battle with hedonism and drug use, eventual death due to sexual hedonism)just to name a few.Empty nurseries, full casinos, empty churches and full mosques, entropy in blitzspeed.Politicians writ in the same ink as Eligabolus, worshiping all that is foreign, poisonous and subversive. So these young men and women see this suicidal nihilism and isolate themselves from this mainstream, “multicultural”, egalitarian, individualistic insanity and look for allies anywhere they can find them, in the flesh or online. They congregate, discuss, despair, strategize, debate and plan. They decry weakness, mock fecklessness and worship strength, and in this worship of strength they radicalize and find the solution. Somehow this isolation then radicalization is seen as a surprise, yet for anyone who was paying attention, it was a long time coming. Once the corporate and state medias grip on the zeitgeist of modernity was finally broken by the internet,true freedom of thought and discussion flourished and the overton window was not just shifted, but shattered. All possibility of expression and belief was open to be taught, discussed and spoken. This open and often anonymous discussion allowed for information, outside of the states and the corporation control, to be accessed often for the first time. The result is obvious. People are finding their way home. Finding their people, finding their traditions, seeing through the lies of history, the brainwashing of the institutions and they angry, they are energized and yes, against their degenerate societies, they are radicalized. RADICALIZATION IS THE RATIONAL RESPONSE TO DEGENERATION

The failure of Assimilation

Expecting immigrants to assimilate to a dying, decadent culture is laughable. Who would willing leave their own strong, dominant and rising culture to join an elderly, decaying, degenerate culture? What
culture would entice a man, one of traditions, beauty, architecture, art and prosperity, or a culture of decay, self-hatred, childlessness, disorder and nihilism? More immigrants are choosing to retain their own healthy culture, year by year, and even more telling, our own people are beginning to join them, looking outside their own watered down and deteriorating culture to look for purpose and guidance from outside sources. The weaker we become the more immigrants will refuse to join us, refuse to partake in the cultural suicide that we extol. That should surprise no one. NO ONE WILL WILLFULLY JOIN THE DECAY

Green nationalism is the only true nationalism
There is no Conservatism without nature, there is no nationalism without environmentalism, the natural environment of our lands shaped us just as we shaped it. We were born from our lands and our own culture was molded by these same lands .The protection and preservation of these lands is of the same importance as the protection and preservation of our own ideals and beliefs. For too long we have allowed the left to co-opt the environmentalist movement to serve their own needs. The left has controlled all discussion regarding environmental preservation whilst simultaneously presiding over the continued destruction of the natural environment itself through mass immigration and uncontrolled urbanization, whilst offering no true solution to either issue. There is no Green future with never ending population growth, the ideal green world cannot exist in a World of 100 billion 50 billion or even 10 billion people. Continued immigration into Europe is environmental warfare and ultimately destructive to nature itself. The Europe of the future is not one of concrete and steel,smog and wires but a place of forests, lakes, mountains and meadows. Not a place where english is the defacto language but a place where every European language, belief and tradition is valued. Each nation and each ethnicity was melded by their own environment and if they are to be protected so must their own environments. THERE IS NO TRADITIONALISM WITHOUT ENVIRONMENTALISM

Kill High Profile Enemies

There are well known enemies of our nations, enemies of our race that freely walk through our societies, heads held high, believing themselves untouchable. They will soon find out how wrong they truly are. Traitors deserve a traitors death. No matter if it takes 3 years or 30 years, these people must pay for their disgusting attacks upon our race. TATP packages strapped to drones,an EFP in a motorcycle saddle bags, convoy ambush rammings with cement trucks. Any method that gives
these traitors their sure reward is viable and should be encouraged. Where there is a will, there is a way. Merkel, the mother of all things anti-white and anti-germanic, is top of the list. Few have done more to damage and racially cleanse Europe of its people. Erdogan, the leader of one of the oldest enemies of our people, and the leader of the largest islamic group within Europe. This warlord must bleed his last, whilst he visits his ethnic soldiers currently occupying Europe. His death will also drive a wedge between the Turk invaders currently occupying our lands and the ethnic European people whilst simultaneously weakening Turkeys hold on the region, removing a prime enemy of Russia and destabilizing and fracturing NATO. Sadiq Khan, The current mayor of London at the time of writing, an open sign of the disenfranchisement and ethnic replacement of the british people in the british isles. This Pakistani muslim invader now sits as representative for the people of London. Londinium ,the very heart of the British isles. What better sign of the white rebirth than the removal of this invader? KILL ANGELA MERKEL, KILL ERDOGAN, KILL SADIQ KHAN

The Paradox of the diverse equality

The greatest joke of all is the quixotic foolishness of the diverse but equal society. Diversity by its very definition belies equality. No two different things can ever truly be equal, especially humans. There is no one person equal to any other, not identical twins, not countrymen, not workers within a class group and certainly not those of differing races. Every human is worth only their own value, no more or less. The more diverse a group becomes, the less equal it becomes. Diversity is anathema to equality. One cannot exist with the other. DIVERSITY IS UNEQUAL,HIERARCHIES ARE CERTAIN

The present is a gift from those in our past
Your ancestors did not sweat,bleed and die in the name of a multicultural, egalitarian nation. They built homes for their children to live in, they built communities for their people to thrive in, they built nations for their people to survive in. They slaved for a better future for their people, and now other peoples shake their fists and point their fingers, reprimanding us for living better lives, wealthier lives in wealthier countries. This wealth and prosperity was paid for in the sweat and blood of your ancestors. Our present comfortable, privileged and prosperous life was gifted to us by our forebears, with the belief that we would maintain, cherish and even expand upon their work, so that one day our own children can enjoy the rewards of our labour. We must strive to create a nation worthy of our ancestors, that we give our people the very best lives, and nations that are worthy of them. A nation that venerates its ancestors, but lives for its offspring. VENERATE THE ANCESTORS BUT WORK FOR THE CHILDREN

A soldiers fight

The ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. Even at Vienna in 1683 we Europeans still lost over fourteen thousand good men. That was during a triumphant VICTORY. Do you believe you are better than these men? More deserving of life? More skilled and courageous? You are not. If they could die, so can you. Expect death, expect struggle, expect loss that you will never forget. Do not expect to survive, the only thing you should expect is a true war and to die the death of a true soldier. EXPECT A SOLDIERS FIGHT AND A SOLDIERS DEATH

The Danger of the Invader

If you were to kill sixty armed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, you would be hailed a hero, given your nations highest civilian honours, paraded before the media and the adoring public. But kill sixty unarmed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, and you will be considered a monster, dragged through the streets, ridiculed, attacked,your character assassinated in every way it can be and finally tried in court and imprisoned for the rest of your life. But here’s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader. We can fight the armed invader, we
know how, we have the ability, we have the soldiers and arms to do so. But the unarmed invader, we have no real idea on how to deal with them, we are unable to attack them or fend them off in any meaningful way. Both would seek to destroy our nation, both would seek to displace and replace our people, both would seek to destroy our culture and nationhood. But only one has the ability and only one has shown to be effective at doing so. THE UNARMED INVADER IS MORE DANGEROUS THAT THE ARMED

The Lightning March through the institutions
While the lefts march through the institutions was long and ultimately successful we must achieve the same, but in a much shorter time period. Due to the threat of ethnic replacement and our own horribly low birth rates, we do not have 150 years or even 50 years to achieve positions of power. We must be intrinsically leveraged into the political, militaristic, judicial, educational and economic institutions, and within 25 years. We do not have the luxury of time like the left had, we must be ready to act, and act soon. That means those that can, or have the ability should look to ingrain themselves into these institutions and climb as far up the power hierarchy as possible, in the shortest time possible. When the time comes you must be ready to act. BLITZ TO DOMINANT POSITIONS

All true movements are populist movements

While the movement itself, at least in the vanguard stage, does not need to have the support of the entire population, eventually we will need our people to join our new society, and voluntarily. They must be willing and wishing to be a part of this new future we envision.We cannot, and should not, rely on oppression to encourage the population to fit this new paradigm. Through our own actions and speech we shall show them a new path. A path focusing on nature and respect for the environment, traditions, families, workers rights and personal and racial responsibilities. We must excel, both personally and as a society. Whilst we may use edgy humour and memes in the vanguard stage, and to attract a young audience, eventually we will need to show the reality of our thoughts and our more serious intents and wishes for the future. For now we appeal to the anger and black comedic nature of the present, but eventually we will need to show the warmth and genuine love we have for our people. SHOW THEM THE WAY FORWARD

There is no sheltered meadow
There is nowhere left to run, turn around, face your enemy, make your stand. There is not a single place left where the tendrils of replacement migration have not touched. There is no single place in the West that is even close to reaching replacement level birthrates, let alone birthrates that indicate a level of vitality and vigour. There is no pleasant meadow in which you can lay down your weary body, rest your head and wait for it all to blow over. You will find no reprieve, not in Iceland, not in Poland, not in New Zealand, not in Argentina, not in Ukraine, not anywhere in the world. I know, because I have been there. Nor should you, why should you have peace when your other brothers in Europe face certain war? Why you should risk nothing whilst others risk all? Why should others fight for you if you are not willing to fight for yourself? Don’t run from the fight, run towards the fight. Look to the heart of the
conflict, march yourself there, press yourself into service. Give your everything to your people. STOP RUNNING, START FIGHTING

Emotions rule over facts
Stop trying to persuade the general population with statistics, charts, tablets and figures. A a one-point-seven percentage point difference may mean something to a few, but a ingeniously worded expression or brilliantly crafted poster will convince the many. Humans are emotional, they are driven by emotions, guided by emotions and seek emotion expressions and experiences. Monotonous repetition of immigration facts and statistics will simply bore the masses, and drive the people away from the stale and uninspired speakers that propagate them. Be creative, be expressive, be emotional and above all be passionate. These are the things that speak to people, connect people, drive people. Paint, write, sing, dance, recite poetry. Hell, even meme. Create memes, post memes, and spread memes. Memes have done more for the ethno-nationalist movement than any manifesto. Above all, just don’t be stale,placid and boring. No one is inspired by Jeb Bush. BE PASSIONATE, NOT PLACID

No Profits for Anti-Whites

For too long those who have profited most from the importation of cheap labour have gone unpunished. The economic elites who line their pockets with the profit received from our own ethnic replacement. These greed filled bastards expect to replace our people with a race of low intellect, low agency, muddled, muddied masses just so their own wealth and power can increase. They will soon realize there are repercussions to being a race traitors. These repercussions will hit them hard, fast and without mercy. If they flee we will follow them, if they hide we will find them, if they try to shield themselves behind the state we will break through and reach them. If a an individual is in ownership or control of a corporation or business, and advocates or even accepts the mass importation of non-whites to
replace the native European populations, then that traitor must be destroyed. KILL YOUR LOCAL ANTI-WHITE CEO

Protect your people, remove the poison
Poison sellers and toxin spreaders are free to proliferate their baneful products completely unchecked by law or society. Each year these degenerates are responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, in our own cities and across the globe. Both illegal and legal drug dealers are our racial enemies, ruining the
health, wealth, family structure, culture and future of our people.These peddlers of filth are active in every nation and behave without any thought of their impact on their societies. Find where they are in your cities,plan your attack, destroy them.Protect your people and protect your children.Be the Antidote to their poison. KILL YOUR LOCAL DRUG DEALER

Europe for Europeans

The invaders must be removed from European soil, regardless from where they came or when they came. Roma, African, Indian, Turkish, Semitic or other. If they are not of our people, but live in our lands, they must be removed. Where they are removed to is not our concern, or responsibility. Our lands are not their home, they can return to their own lands or found their homelands elsewhere. But they will not occupy our soil. How they are removed is irrelevant, peacefully, forcefully, happily, violently or diplomatically. They must be removed. Until these interlopers are repatriated to their peoples lands, then Europe has no true sovereignty, and anyone, no matter their ethnicity or beliefs
can call Europe their own. REMOVE THE INVADERS, RETAKE EUROPE

You wait for a signal, whilst your people wait for YOU
Whilst you wait for a sign, a signal; someone to take up the spear; to cry out in alarm, your people wait on YOU. You are the voice, you are the klaxon call, you hold the first spear to be thrust at the invaders. Stop waiting for someone else to show you the way forward, YOU are the way forward, waiting around for someone to start the fight is moronic, because it is YOU that is going to start the fight, If you are reading this, you are the new leaders that will push our people to victory, you are the soldiers that will fight for the future of your race. The people speaking now, acting now, fighting now, are the vanguard of the vanguard of the force of the people. Lead and your people will follow. Show the strength of your convictions, the truth of yours and the iron-hard strength of your will and they will follow. YOU WAIT FOR A SIGNAL, WHILE YOUR PEOPLE WAIT FOR YOU

It is never wise to become a minority group.

In every country, on every continent, those that are in the minority are oppressed. If you become a social, political or ethnic minority it will always lead to your oppression. Whether they are a political minority and therefore lose the control of the majority of power, and thus lose control of the laws and regulations that define public life or those that are the cultural minority find that art in all its forms is created and controlled by a different audience, from a different people from a different history, with differing ideals and experiences and therefore they find themselves isolated, excluded and removed from the creation of contemporary culture. Those that find themselves born linguistically in the minority suffer daily, as the conversation of life excludes them, the mass media isolates them and businesses turn them away, as does the societies speech itself. Finally there are those that find themselves in the ethnic or racial minority and find their very own genes being bred out of existence through miscegenation and differing racial birth rates. The same people will find themselves gradually less and less represented both politically and culturally, becoming essentially foreigners in their own lands. MINORITIES ARE NEVER TREATED WELL, DO NOT BECOME ONE

Do not allow your enemies to grow unchecked
When you discover a nest of vipers in your yard, do you spare the adolescents? Do you allow them to grow freely, openly, to one day bite you child as they play in their own yard? No. You burn the nest and kill the vipers, no matter their age. The enemies of our children are being born in our lands right now, even as you read this. These same children will one day become teens, then adults, voting against the wishes of our people, practicing the cultural and religious practices of the invaders, taking our peoples lands, work, houses and even attacking and killing our children. A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Preventing these enemies from reaching adulthood and their full potential of effect is of the importance. Why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? Few parents, regardless of circumstance, will willing risk the lives of their children, no matter the economic incentives. Therefore, once we show them the risk of bringing their offspring to our soil, they will avoid our lands. It will be distasteful, it will be damaging to the soul, but know that it is necessary and any invader you spare, no matter the age, will one day be an enemy your people must face. Better for you to face them now then your kin to face them in the future. LEAVE NO VIPERS NEST UNBURNT

Don’t leave the cities, Run towards the fight, Not away

Run towards the cities, run towards the conflict,run towards the enemy, fleeing from the enemy is cowardice. The countrysides are already ours, as they have always been. The people of the countrysides are already traditional, already close to nature, already supportive of their people. Its the cities where the struggle lies, its the cities where the invaders have massed, its the cities where the marxists have poisoned the institutions, its the cities where the traitorous media and corporations lie and its the cities where the anti-white politicians and the NGOs make their homes. Invade the cities, take the cities, battle in the streets for the cities. The cities are the economic, judicial, political,ethnic and cultural battleground of our people and it is there we shall wage our war. The countryside can wait, the cities need you, your youth needs you. Despite how many of you may feel living amongst the pollution, amongst the cultural filth, crammed into tiny apartments in the city sprawls, far flung from mans natural environment. But it is there our future will be made and it is there the battle for our peoples future will be fought. RETAKE THE CITIES, RETAKE YOUR BIRTHRIGHT

Support Your Brother Nations

When one country moves ,you move with them, support them financially, politically, socially and physically. They may be able to discredit one small movement, from one nation. But when Europeans from all countries and continents move to back their brothers, they cannot possibly attack any one group. The movement may begin in Poland, Austria, France, Argentina, Australia, Canada or even Venezuela, but the movement will begin and when it does, be ready to throw your weight behind your people, with full force. Support them economically , donate to their cause, buy products from their people, volunteer your resources and labour. Support them socially, back their policies, attack their detractors, voice upon support to the media and in daily conversations, make it understood on the internet that all Europeans nations support them. Support them politically, voice support of their leaders, their ideals and their people. Lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. Only elect leaders that show support to your brother nation. Support them physically, be ready to put boots on the ground, send them weapons and munitions, attack their enemies. If the media or state in your region attacks them, destroy the corporation and traitorous politicians responsible. Physical force is the ultimate form of support. MOVE AS ONE, FULL SUPPORT FOR BROTHER NATIONS

Accept Death, Embrace Infamy
Death is certain, you may die in service to some grand crusade or pass away in a hospice, either way you will die. What matters is your actions during the brief time between birth and death. The worth of your life is not measured by the length of your life, but your actions during it. Ask yourself now, are you willing to shirk your racial responsibilities? turn your back to your people? ignore their demise? All in the hopes of a peaceful death? Accept death:as it is as certain as the setting of the sun at evenfall. Only when you embrace death and the only thing you will have left to fear is inaction. Embrace infamy: the enemies of your people will beset upon you, on all sides. The media will paint you as villains, the state will name you as traitors, the globalist forces will name you as criminals and the traitors amongst your people will name you as enemies. You will be infamous until victory is achieved. Take it with a smile. ACCEPT DEATH, EMBRACE INFAMY, ACHIEVE VICTORY

Numbers aren’t everything
In 2019, we currently have the largest number of people of our race in history(between 760-980million depending on definitions),yet we are losing even our smallest towns to ethnic replacement. Numbers aren’t everything, ten lions are worth of thousand sheep.The reason we are currently losing our lands is not due to a lack of numbers, or wealth, or military force. It is due to a lack of will. We could deport or otherwise destroy the entire population of invading non-Europeans in a week, if we as a race we chose to.We have the ability, we only need the will. Focusing on increasing the population of whites, or trying to gain economic wealth or military might, whilst already having met the requirement of numbers, wealth and military force needed is simply a stalling tactic, spoken and put forth by men too cowardly to do what is required. These men would stall and delay any action indefinitely, until all necessary action has been undertaken by some other, more courageous man. All so they need not carry any personal risk or struggle themselves. Ignore the naysayers and weasels who will always repeat “Not Now! Just Wait! Not Yet! We Could Be Hurt!” for them the time will never come. Just as their own courage will never flower forth. THE BEST TIME FOR ATTACK WAS YESTERDAY, THE SECOND BEST TIME IS NOW

The birthrates must eventually be addressed, at all costs
Even if all invaders are deported tomorrow and all traitors are dealt with as they truly deserve, we are still living on borrowed time. Whether it takes ten years or a thousands years, whilst we are facing birth rates at sub-replacement levels, then our people are dying. We grow older, fewer, weaker and more fundamentally closer to true death the longer we allow our birthrates to remain so catastrophically low. This isn’t an issue that is being faced solely by our own people, but many peoples across the world. Nations across Asia, Europe and the Americas are facing this disaster together. Some are at different stages than others but all are feeling the pressure. The true question is, how did this happen? And what can we do to stop it? The only people that seemingly do not face such issues are those with strong traditions, gender norms, societal norms;the poor and the religious, usually a combination of all. This should give us an indication of what may be truly at the heart of the issue. What can we do to fix it? The issue is complicated, far more complicated and difficult to fix than the issue of Ethnic replacement. Likely a new society will need to be created with a much greater focus on family values, gender and social norms and the value and importance of nature, culture and race. WITHOUT CHILDREN, THERE IS NO FUTURE

There is no democratic Solution
Understand here and now, there is no democratic solution, any attempt to vote your way out of Ethnic replacement will be met with at first with derision, then contempt and finally by force. This solution of a Democratic salvation is nothing but a pipe dream, and as our enemies increase within our lands, driven by mass immigration and the invaders own higher birth rate it will be pushed further and further into the realms of impossibility. The media of the world will be used against you, the education system of the rulers will be used against you, the financial power of the worlds corporations will be used against you, the military and legislative might of the UN, the EU and NATO itself will be used against you and even your own, previously corrupted, religious leaders will be used against you. Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our own enemies. The global and corporate ran press controls them, the education system(long since fallen to the long march through the institutions committed by the marxists)controls them, the state(long since heavily lost to its corporate backers)controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of a Democratic victory, prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss and struggle, as it is the only path to Victory. VOTING IS MOB RULE AND MOB RULE IS MEDIA RULE AND MEDIA RULE IS CORPORATE RULE

NGOs are directly involved in the genocide of the European people
Beholden to no one and hiding their true intent behold a faux-religious facade, these NGO groups ferry the invaders to European shores aboard their own vessels, directly shipping this vast army straight into European nations to plunder, rape and ethnically displace the native European people. Meanwhile they badger, trick and guilt-shame the European people into forfeiting their own hard earned income and giving it directly to their peoples cultural and ethnic competitors, many of which have the only intent of conquering and destroying the European peoples. This stripping of wealth and prosperity in order to feed and develop our cultural competitors is an act of civilization terrorism resulting in the reduction in development and living conditions of our own people for the benefit of those that hate us. More often than not these NGOs hide their true intentions behind a facade of religiosity and only once you investigate into the leadership and governance of the NGO itself do you find the people running the show are in fact far from religious themselves and more often than not are actually atheistic cultural marxists using naive Christian Europeans to both labour and fund fund their own attempt at class and racial warfare. These NGO’s are the modern money changers inside the church, and must be driven out, by voice or by whip. It may upset many, but the truth of the matter is these people are directly responsible for the current invasion and sacking of Europe and their treachery has damaged European prospects greatly. Crush these traitor NGOs, kill their leadership, burn down their buildings, bomb their ships, tear down their posters and destroy their membership. Drive them from your lands and give the traitors what traitors deserve: a traitors death. NGOs ARE TRAITOR ORGANIZATIONS

If you lose history will write you as monsters, regardless of your tactics.

Win first, write the narrative later. Victors write the history and the writers of history control the cultural climate of the present time. If you lose, no matter how you acted in your loss; whether that is heroically, cowardly, violently, peacefully, virtuously or criminally, if your enemies are writing the history they will describe you as a devil. Do not fret on the manner of how victory is achieved, all methods are possible, in the face of ethnic genocide, all morality is ambiguous. Win first, write the story later. An act, which morals you doubt in the present, will be writ by your people in wonder and admiration in the books of history. YOU WILL BE REVERED, BUT ONLY IF YOU WIN. When anyone can be a German, a Brit, a Frenchmen, then being European has truly lost all meaning Make no mistake, the erosion of local and national identity has no come about by accident, it is a concerted and targeted effort against the European people. The idea that a Frenchmen need not speak the language, share the culture, believe in the same god or even more importantly be ethnically French is ludicrous in the extreme. This is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. This is a tactic practiced not only on the French people, but on all the peoples of Europe, effectively destroying the nations identity at its core and smashing apart all bonds which a successful, unified nation is built upon. A Moroccan may never be an Estonian much the same as an Estonian may never be a Moroccan. There are cultural, ethnic and RACIAL differences that makes interchanging one ethnic group with another an
impossibility. The idea that all it takes for a Han chinese man to become German is to be born on German soil is as insane as a German born on Mars becoming a Martian. Europe is only Europe because of its combined genetic, cultural and linguistic heritage. When non-Europeans are considered Europe, than there is no Europe at all. EUROPES VALUE IS IN THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE

The time after the baby boomers have passed isn’t the time to START acting, but the time we should be FINISHING our victory. It is understood by many that the only real reason that many statistics of our ethnic replacement haven’t yet matched with our reality is that are numbers are currently buoyed by the baby boomer generation. As these baby boomers pass on and leave us behind, there will be a rapid and obvious change in the demographic make up of our nations, both statistically and socially. This rapid change in demography will bring about a time of crisis, as the reality of our possible ethnic replacement becomes obvious to all, even the naysayers. This time cannot be relied on for a beginning of the rebellion, only utilized as a final stage of energy and escalation to finalize our capture of power. If we wait until the majority of the boomers begin to pass(between 2028-2038 depending on individual nations and life expectancies)than it will be too little, too late. As by this time the invaders and occupiers of lands, non-Europeans, numbers will swollen to a staggering size, due to both mass immigration and the differing birthrates between the native European people and these invaders. Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion,most likely from the east, specifically China;Turkey;India or some combination of the three. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. We must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. The risk is too great. We attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after. VICTORY CANNOT WAIT, YOUR PEOPLE NEED YOU NOW!

From where great leaders arise
The men and women needed by a society in crisis are created by a greater societal group thought, they arise from their environment,from their folk, seeming springing forth from the people as if they were waiting for the moment. They are not so much born as made to be what is needed of them by the greater group thought occurring around them. These leaders will be paragon examples of your people, virtuous, incorruptible, speaking truth to power and a truth that resonates with your very soul. WHEN YOU SEE THEM; WHEN YOU HEAR THEM; YOU WILL KNOW THEM, AS THEY ARE YOU, AND YOURS.

Do nothing, Win nothing, Achieve nothing.
Inaction will lead to sure defeat. Sitting at home comfortable, relaxed, posting on the internet, watching football and waiting for victory to arrive at your feet, will win you nothing. Without overwhelming effort and extreme risk, expect nothing. You cannot expect others do take the risks for you, nor should you wish for others to labour for you, if you are unwilling. The only option for a true man or woman of Europe is to labour, labour with all effort towards victory. Nothing else will do. All else is insufficient. All else is intolerable. All else is dishonorable. Perhaps you could tap out,lay down, lick the boots of your occupiers and pray they will let you be comfortable, if only for a little while. But you won’t. You can’t. Not if you know what I know and want for what we want. You will risk, struggle, strive, drive, stumble, fall, crawl, charge and perspire, all in the name of victory. Because you cannot accept anything less. WITH RISK COMES POSSIBILITIES, WITH POSSIBILITES COMES CHANCE FOR VICTORY

Destabilization and Accelerationism: tactics for victory
True change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great crucible of crisis. A gradual change is never going to achieve victory. Stability and comfort are the enemies of revolutionary change. Therefore we must destabilize and discomfort society where ever possible. A political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. Revolutionary change is
needed and above all necessary. It is far better to encourage radical,violent change regardless of its origins. As only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur. These tumultuous times can be brought about through action. For example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by both supporting, attacking, vilifying,radicalizing and exaggerating all societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts. A vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. Canvas public areas in support of radical positions, even if they are not your own. Incite conflict.Place posters near public parks calling for sharia law, then in the next week place posters over such posters calling for the expulsion of all immigrants, repeat in every area of public life until the crisis arises. Destabilize, then take control. If we want to radically and fundamentally change society, then we need to radicalize society as much as possible. DO NOT FEAR CHANGE, WE ARE CHANGE

Globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists

If an ethnocentric European future is to be achieved global free markets and the trade of goods is to be discouraged at all costs. An environmentally conscious and moral society will never be able to
economically compete with a society based on ever increasing industrialization, urbanization, industrial output and population increase. The cheaper labour and ignorance of environmental health will always
result in cheaper goods produced with less effort and inevitably result in control of the market. A Europe of nature, culture and sustainable living practicing will not be able to ever compete in the global market. The global market thus therefore never be allowed to compete in the new European market. Barring the importation of all goods produced outside the New European zone(the new Western world) is an essential pillar of the future Western economy. Goods produced without care for the natural world ,dignity of workers, lasting culture or or white civilizations future should never be allowed
into the new morally focused and ethically focused European market. CHEAP LABOUR AND ALL CONSUMING INDUSTRY ARE NOT IDEALS, BLOCK FOREIGN GOODS FROM WHITE MARKETS

Break the back of cheap labour
Make no mistake, the major impetus for the mass importation of non-Europeans into Europe is the call and want for cheap labour. Nothing drives the invasion more and nothing needs to be defeated more than the greed that demands cheap labour. Break it’s back, anyway you can. Whether that is by encouraging and pushing increases to the minimum wage; furthering the unionization of workers; increasing the native birthrate and thereby reducing the need for the importation of labour;
increasing the rights of workers; pushing for the increase in automation or advancement of industrial labour replacement or any other tactic that is available. In the end human greed and the need for increasing profit margins of capital owners needs to be fought against and broken. CHEAP LABOUR IS SLAVE LABOUR, REFUSE TO IMPORT MODERN SLAVES

A boil over in the melting pot
Civil war in the so called “Melting pot” that is the United States should be a major aim in overthrowing the global power structure and the Wests’ egalitarian, individualist, globalist dominant culture. In the United States, perhaps more than anywhere else in the world, the cult of the individual has been practiced for the longest time and with the deepest devotion. Luckily for us, the end results of this deracialized, irreligious and deculturized program show themselves. The United States is in turmoil, more so that at any other time in history. States hate other states, the electoral college is under attack at every turn and the races are at each others throats. On top of this is a two party political system, split by racial, social, cultural, linguistic and class divides. The end result is a nation in gridlock, unable to respond to any great change, unable to commit to any great projects. A political and social stalemate that makes any advancement impossible. Meanwhile the 10000 ton boulder of demographic change rolls ever forward, gaining momentum and possibly destroying all in its path. Eventually, when the white population of the USA realizes the truth of the situation, war will erupt. Soon the replacement of the whites within Texas will hit its apogee and with the non-white political and social control of Texas;and with this control, the electoral college will be heavily stacked in favor of a democratic victory so that every electoral cycle will be a certainty. After an election cycle or two with certain Democratic victory, those remaining, non democratic voting, non brainwashed whites will see the future clear before them, and with this knowledge realize the impossibility of a diplomatic or political victory. Within a short time regular and widespread political, social and racial violence will commence. In this tempest of conflict is where will be strike, a strong, unified, ethnically and culturally focused pro-white, pro-european group will be everything the average white family need and long for. With these boosted numbers, and with our unified forces, complete control of the United states will be possible. Above all be ready for violence, and when the times comes, strike hard and fast. THE MYTH OF THE MELTING POT MUST END, AND WITH IT THE MYTH OF THE EGALITARIAN NATION

No taxes to anti-white States

Until our nations are run by men and women loyal to our cause taxation should be considered theft, and refusal to pay taxes a sign of racial loyalty. Giving your own earned wealth, which you received through your own labour, to a person or group that despises you, places laws into effect that disenfranchises your people and seeks to ethnically replace you is utterly foolish. Do not pay to have your people destroyed, do not line the pockets of the traitors within our ranks, don’t lend support to a corrupt and broken state. Refuse to pay taxes. Refuse. When they demand you pay, refuse. When
they ask why, you tell them why. They will threaten you with jail, they may even threaten you with direct force. They may even go through with your imprisonment or physically harm you. But eventually, when enough people fight back and refuse to pay taxes, refuse to fund the traitors in power, the state itself will wilt, then collapse. So take the prison time, take the beating or even fight back. But do not pay taxes to anti-whites. TAXATION IS THEFT IN A TRAITOROUS SYSTEM

Section IV
In conclusion
Out of the night that covers me, Black as the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For my unconquerable soul. In the fell clutch of circumstance I have not winced nor cried aloud. Under the bludgeonings of chance My head is bloody, but unbowed. Beyond this place of wrath and tears Looms but the Horror of the shade, And yet the menace of the years Finds and shall find me unafraid. It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll, I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul. -Invictis by William Ernest Henley There is only one victory, but many defeats. To lose our lands, our culture and our people is a defeat. To continue on without our culture, but still own our lands, is a defeat. To survive with our culture, but to lose our lands, to lose our future, is a defeat. There is only one victory. The survival of our people, our culture and our lands isn’t enough. We must thrive, we must march ever forward to our place among the stars and we WILL reach the destiny our people deserve. Anything else is a defeat. The war will not be easy, the death toll will assuredly be high. The going will be tough and many of us will die. I cannot guarantee it will be comfortable, I cannot guarantee it will be easy and I cannot guarantee that every act will be a success. All I can guarantee is that inaction is sure defeat, power structures will be tested and likely will fall and most of all there is only the future ahead and attempting to march back to any earlier time will get you no where at all. You may stumble. You may fall. But the only way to get to the final destination, total victory, is to get up and keep marching forward. No matter what. March. Mistakes will be made, losses will be had, some failures are certain and some endeavours will go bad. But in the end the struggle is a beauty in itself, and the victory will be all the sweeter because of it.Final victory is yours, if you have the will for it. As for me, my time has come. I cannot guarantee my success. All I know is the certainty of my will and the necessity of my cause. Live or die, know I did it all for you; my friends, my family, my people, my culture, my RACE. Goodbye, god bless you all and I will see you in Valhalla. EUROPA RISES

——————————————————————————————————-
Fin du texte du manifeste.

Mes commentaires.

La première partie du texte est tellement différente de la deuxième, qu’il est possible qu’il n’ait pas été écrit par la même personne. Ca pourrait indiquer qu’il n’était pas seul, ou fait partie d’une organisation. On ne saura probablement jamais.

« Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death. Every day we become fewer in number, we grow older,we grow weaker. In the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us. To maintain a population the people must achieve a birthrate that reaches replacement fertility levels. In the Western world this is roughly 2.06 births per woman. « 

Statistiquement, il a raison, et c’est un problème réel. Le taux de natalité en occident est tellement bas que ca signifie qu’en deux générations, cette population cessera d’exister, déjà il est trop tard pour renverser la tendance (sans compter les extrémistes écolos qui disent de pas faire d’enfants pour « sauver la planète »). La solution de plusieurs gouvernements occidentaux a été d’augmenter les taux d’immigration pour éviter la catastrophe. Ca a marché pendant un moment, le temps que les immigrants étaient des atouts, ils venaient de pays culturellement semblables, des gens formés et qui s’intégraient bien à leur terre d’accueil. Mais depuis quelques années, les immigrants sont devenus un fardeau, ils sont moins formés, beaucoup viennent pour profiter de généreux programmes sociaux (migrants économiques), incapables de travailler. L’intégration, particulièrement des musulmans, est beaucoup plus difficile. Culturellement les musulmans intégristes refusent de s’intégrer parce que leur religion/idéologie politique leur dit qu’ils sont supérieurs, et doivent donc conquérir et convertir les « inférieurs ». Et beaucoup de terroristes parmis leurs rangs ont commis des attentats partout en occident, certains même étaient des occidentaux radicalisés par des imams extrémistes, ce qui contribue grandement à la haine envers ce groupe.

Donc à premiere vue, on aurait affaire à un raciste, anti-musulman. Sauf que plus loin, on découvre autre chose. Il ne s’agit pas d’une haine envers les musulmans ou l’islam directement, mais une haine envers ceux qui font beaucoup d’enfants parce que selon-lui, c’est mauvais pour la planète, et que en plus ça va conduire à l’extinction de la race blanche. Le « grand remplacement » qui est ouvertement souhaité par les globalistes et les racistes anti-blancs comme BLM.

Il se voit en défenseur de son peuple, tout comme Nelson Mandela etait défenseur de son peuple:
I do not just expected to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize.As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime.

Mais est-ce que c’était un raciste, suprémaciste blanc, « extrême-droite », néo-nazi?
Non, il semble que c’est un nationaliste, activiste extrémiste environnementaliste, sympatisant communiste, avec une tendance raciste, mais seulement envers certaines ethnies, celles qui se multiplient beaucoup et ne s’intègrent pas:

Extraits:

Were/are you a “xenophobe”?
No, no culture scares me. I am only wary of those cultures with higher fertility rates replacing others.

Were/are you a “islamophobe”?
No, I am not afraid of islam, only that, due to its high fertility rates, it will grow to replace other peoples and faiths.

Were/are you a nationalist?
Yes, predominantly an ethno-nationalist(I place importance on the health and well being of my race above all else).

Were/are you an anti-semite?
No.A jew living in israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people.

Were/are you a neo-nazi?
That is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. So no, I don’t believe so.

Were/are you a conservative?
No, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it.

Were/are you a fascist?
Yes. For once, the person that will be called a fascist, is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that. I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature. The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.

Were/are you “right wing”?

Depending on the definition, sure.

Were/are you “left wing”?
Depending on the definition, sure.

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?
As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

Did you always hold these views?
No, when I was young I was a communist, then an anarchist and finally a libertarian before coming to be an eco-fascist.

Who do you consider white?
Those that are ethnically and culturally European.

Who do you consider non-white?
Those who are not ethnically and culturally European.

Il dit aussi avoir choisi les armes (au lieu de d’autres techniques comme les bombes) parce que ça allait causer une mouvance anti-gun, et que c’est voulu pour provoquer les gens à se battre pour leurs droit à avoir des armes.

Won’t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from Whites in the United states?
Yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time.

Et il dit clairement à plusieurs endroit être un faciste, même un éco-fasciste. Contrairement à ce que les médias et les profs d’histoire marxistes disent, le fascisme n’est pas « extrème droite ». Le fascisme est à la base du socialisme, mélangé avec du nationalisme. Le socialisme et le fascisme, tout comme le communisme, sont des idéologies totalitaires qui requièrent l’usage de la force pour contrôler le peuple.

Violence isn’t the answer, why are you using force?
There is no nation in the world that wasn’t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. Force is power. History is the history of power. Violence is power and violence is the reality of history.Wake up.

Et l’éco-fascisme est un système totalitaire, semblable au fascisme, mais à la différence que c’est la Nature, au lieu de la Nation qui est le point central, ce pourquoi les gens doivent se sacrifier.

Définition de Wikipedia:
« Ecofascism is a theoretical political model in which a totalitarian government would require individuals to sacrifice their own interests to the « organic whole of nature » and which would rely on militarism, expansionism, and possibly racism to defend the land. »


Why focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue?
Because they are the same issue, the environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.

Conclusion
Quelle est la solution pour empêcher ce genre d’évènement de se reproduire? Il faut que les pays occidentaux filtrent mieux les immigrants, il faut cesser de faire entrer des gens qui refusent de s’intégrer et que dès qu’ils sont citoyens ne font que répandre la haine envers ceux qui les ont acceuillis.
Les médias doivent cesser de cacher ou diminuer l’impact des attentats islamistes qui sont très nombreux, et à l’opposé de faire la une avec les attentats comme celui-ci, en disant tout plein de mensonges sur les intentions véritables du terroriste. Victimiser les musulmans ne fait que servir la cause des extrémistes, ou même justifier leurs prochains attentats comme étant des représailles. Si rien n’est fait, ça va éventuellement en arriver à une guerre civile, comme ce que souhaite l’auteur de cet attentat.

On doit accepter les gens, qu’importe leur race, qui viennent ici pour s’intégrer et participer à la société qui les accueille, parce qu’ils ont choisi ce pays justement pour ses valeurs de liberté et de démocratie. De même qu’accepter les musulmans culturels (athées, homosexuels ou non-intégristes), parce qu’ils se sauvent d’une religion totalitaire et retrograde et veulent venir ici pour des raisons de liberté. Si ce sont des musulmans intégristes qui se sauvent de la guerre, il y a amplement de pays islamistes voisins qui sont compatibles avec leurs valeurs. Dans le cas des immigrants économiques, qui se sauvent d’un pays pauvre qui n’est pas en guerre, ce ne sont pas des réfugiés, ils viennent uniquement pour profiter de généreux programmes sociaux, ils sont un fardeau pour le pays hôte et vont juste contribuer à sa destruction.

Alors oui une meilleure sélection des immigrants fait partie de la solution. Tout comme l’expulsion des extrémistes qui travaillent à détruire le pays qui les a accueilli. Les pays hétérogènes culturellement sont habituellement plus stables que les pays multiculturalistes. Le multiculturalisme est un échec. Le Melting Pot américain est plus proche d’une solution véritable. Les immigrants y sont incités à s’intégrer à la société hôte, et non pas à créer des ghettos culturels comme avec le multiculturalisme là où la société hôte doit s’effacer pour faire place aux autres. Mais les vagues d’immigration massives sont en train de rendre ça plus difficile, même au USA, où les organisations financées par les globalistes et les islamistes sont en train de le miner de l’intérieur. Ces organisations financent les « Antifas » (violents anti-nationalistes, communistes) BLM (groupe qui provoque les tensions raciales pour déstabiliser les USA) et les groupes extrémistes islamistes qui militent pour l’islamisation de l’occident, au grand désaroi des musulmans qui se sont réfugiés en occident pour se sauver de l’islam totalitaire.

Quant au volet éco-fasciste, le brainwash dans les écoles et les médias risque de créer d’autres cas du même genre. Déjà qu’il y a eu d’autres cas d’éco-terrorisme dans le passé, comme celui-ci: https://crioux.wordpress.com/2010/09/02/ecolo-terrorisme/

Si rien n’est fait, il y aura d’autres attentats du même genre. Et pour le moment, les médias et les politiciens font le contraire de ce qui devrait être fait: ils victimisent les musulmans, ils ignorent ou diminuent les horreurs causées par les islamistes (Dans les jours précédent cet attentat, il y a eu des centaines de chrétiens tués par des islamistes dans le monde, mais c’était le silence total des médias). Et chaque jour ils martèlent le message environnementaliste apocalyptique, ils font suivre la propagande comme la grève étudiante pour le climat avec Greta, sans se questionner sur qui est l’organisation derrière ça, ou même sur la science douteuse sur laquelle c’est appuyé.

Combien d’attentats islamistes, combien d’attentats de nationalistes ethniques et éco-fascistes comme celui-ci ca va prendre avant que les gens réalisent qu’il y a des problèmes réels qu’il faut adresser, et que les médias font partie du problème?


Rapel pourquoi j’ai fermé les commentaires

13/03/2019

Malgré que les commentaires soient désactivé, il y en a qui réussissent quand même à envoyer des insultes anymes. Un point pour l’effort. Typique de la gauche extrémiste et des Social Justice Warriors.

« son of a bitch! disgusting right-wing scum! antifascist and ecologist self defense is not violence or terrorism. fuck you zionist bastard! fuck you social darwinist scumbag! fuck you liberal bastard! libertarianism is anarchy for the rich bastards! fuck you piece of shit! »


Radio-Canada qui patine encore

12/03/2019

Radio-Canada qui essaye de faire du révisionnisme en essayant de discréditer un article du journal de Québec de 1983, qui titrait que rendu en l’an 2000, il n’y aurait presque plus de neige à cause du Réchauffement cliamtique. Bien sûr, comme la quasi totalité des prédictions de l’époque, ça n’est jamais arrivé.

Article en question:
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1157889/article-1983-journal-quebec-climat-scientifiques-neige-2000-souvenir?fbclid=IwAR1nySdXcO8TJMPQq4DRSPBprqN0s0Rf-vTFnybyzakmSLZq_aE3C0T1TMw

Il n’y a aucune différence entre cet article et les articles « d’experts » ou d’activistes comme David Suzuki.

En 2000, un « expert » du Climat disait:
According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become « a very rare and exciting event ». « Children just aren’t going to know what snow is »
–David Venir, 2000
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/children-just-arent-going-to-know-what-snow-is/news-story/5a16c85680b7cc94f345240a727fb09d?fbclid=IwAR2hG8Ii1g7YHYrTwyiyU6VhZ4nnNfJkXxPsglbmTDZflDGupmkznEDXPK4

Et en 2013, David Suzuki disait qu’en 2020 (donc l’an prochain), il n’y aurait que 6,5 semaines par année où on pourrait faire du patin extérieur:
« It concludes that, with current emissions trends, the canal’s skating season could shrink from the previous average of nine weeks to 6.5 weeks by 2020, less than six weeks by 2050 and just one week by the end of the century. « 
https://www.straight.com/news/344961/david-suzuki-future-outdoor-ice-rinks-risk?fbclid=IwAR3SHiQmMEW3wcUp4NK6Jj7eNzYjjBTu_EGCD2SjFlHjExhMUPMzctBf9ww

Note: Depuis 2013, on a battu des records de froid et d’enneigement, et les pôles ont actuellement plus de glace qu’en 2013.

Et il y a même pas une semaine, Radio-Canada faisait une prédiction semblable, basé sur des données biaisées et des périodes soigneusement choisies.
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/info/2019/03/neige-accumulation-hiver-quebec-environnement-meteo-gel-degel/index-fr.html?fbclid=IwAR2Qfcp_w4Rr4f4YRHEYbydjtgBDG45crfl4qIH-D2oXv4EnkrUrnlPq81Q

Mais comme Radio-Canada m’a banni, simplement parce que je les avais critiqué quand ils disaient des conneries, je ne peut même pas aller leur démontrer à quel point c’est erroné, et volontairement biaisé.

A titre d’exemple, les périodes sont vicieusement choisies pour donner le résultat voulu.
Par exemple, depuis la fin du Little ice age, vers 1880 (une des périodes les plus froides depuis 8000 ans), il y a eu un réchauffement marqué, jusque vers 1940. Ensuite il y a eu un refroidissement jusque vers les années 1970 (ce qui avait donné le « global cooling scare », les « experts » disaient qu’une ère glaciaire était imminente). Puis entre 1970 et 1998, ça s’est réchauffé un peu, et puis depuis c’est un plateau, plus aucun réchauffement statistiquement significatif. Et depuis fin 2016, il y a une tendance au refroidissement.
Derrières ces variations, il y a des cycles, et ces cycles sont dus à des cycles solaires et océaniques (et non pas au CO2). Et le soleil entre présentement dans une phase de faible activité, comme on en a pas vu depuis le Little Ice age….
Alors vous avez pas fini d’en voir de la neige.

Leur méthodologie est douteuse parce que les choix de périodes et de données allaient clairement donner ce résutlat, alors qu’il ne correspond pas à la réalité. Et les auteurs ne sont pas des scientifiques, encore moins des scientifiques qui comprennent le domaine. C’est un exercice de propagande, tout simplement. (et c’est pas le premier de la part de Radio-Canada: par exemple: https://crioux.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/quiz-de-radio-canada-epreuves-des-faits/ )


Citation

12/03/2019